Open Access

Table 4

Difference in BIC between discarded and applied systematic models for fitting the light curves with PACMAN.

Bin No RS Untied RS White RS pol2
Broadband 751.0 11.3 −78.4
1.13 96.1 105.3 73.5 35.30
1.16 141.9 81.8 5.8 36.70
1.18 48.7 86.2 −1.9 42.60
1.21 30.2 94.6 0.8 41.20
1.23 96.4 89.9 −12.4 40.40
1.26 59.2 94.4 31.7 42.40
1.28 129.9 88.3 10.1 37.60
1.31 542.7 17.0 414.2 −20.40
1.33 77.9 68.7 −3.6 28.50
1.36 220.3 75.2 90.0 23.40
1.39 101.7 86.4 10.4 47.60
1.41 190.5 64.6 86.7 8.10
1.44 402.4 51.6 286.3 16.90
1.46 362.7 67.8 229.8 27.40
1.49 142.7 45.7 46.4 −1.00
1.51 28.2 72.3 9.5 24.10
1.54 253.1 41.7 134.6 −12.10
1.56 56.9 50.0 −2.5 −7.20
1.59 202.6 28.3 139.4 −18.10
1.61 149.3 62.1 3.8 15.20
1.64 188.8 56.4 137.7 14.30

Notes. The PACMAN systematics model for the light curve is compared to alternative modeling approaches: without row shift (RS) correction (Col. 2), with an individual RS correction per visit (Col. 3), with RS parameters fixed to the results of the broadband fit (Col. 3), and with a second order polynomial of the flux with time per visit (Col. 4). A negative value suggests that a model is statistically preferred over the applied systematics model for a respective bin.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.