Open Access

Table 2

All published TNO projected shape axis ratios from occultations.

Name Class b/a Deq (km) References
2003 UY117 Resonant 5:2 0.65 ± 0.15 230 ± 26 1
2007 OC10 Detached 0.58 ± 0.16 33055+56$\[\mathbf{330_{-55}^{+56}}\]$ This work
Huya Plutino 0.89 ± 0.03 411 ± 10 2
2002 TC302 Resonant 5:2 0.85 ± 0.04 500 ± 19 3
2003 VS2(a) Plutino 0.79 ± 0.02 519 ± 10 4
2003 VS2(a) Plutino 0.81 ± 0.08 570 ± 31 5
G!kún||'hòmdímà Detached 0.89 ± 0.08 641 ± 28 6
2003 AZ84(a) Plutino 0.66 ± 0.11 692 ± 59 7
Varda Resonant 15:8 0.93 ± 0.05 740 ± 20 8
2003 AZ84(a) Plutino 0.946 ± 0.005 764 ± 6 7
2002 MS4 Hot classical 0.93 ± 0.05 794 ± 25 9
Quaoar Hot classical 0.880 ± 0.013 1087 ± 11 10
Haumea Resonant 12:7 0.668 ± 0.015 1393 ± 16 11
Makemake Hot classical 0.95 ± 0.03 1466 ± 49 12

Notes. The area-equivalent diameter for each fitted ellipse is also included. We excluded cases where only a circle was fitted. We did not include the remarkable case of Arrokoth (Buie et al. 2020) due to its binary nature. Dynamical classification according to Volk & Laerhoven (2024). (a)These objects have two different occultations published with fitted ellipses. We treat them as separate data points although they are clearly not independent. References: (1) Kretlow et al. (2024a); (2) Santos-Sanz et al. (2022); (3) Ortiz et al. (2020a); (4) Vara-Lubiano et al. (2022); (5) Benedetti-Rossi et al. (2019); (6) Benedetti-Rossi et al. (2016); (7) Dias-Oliveira et al. (2017); (8) Souami et al. (2020); (9) Rommel et al. (2023); (10) Pereira et al. (2023); (11) Ortiz et al. (2017); (12) Ortiz et al. (2012).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.