Open Access

Table 1.

Radial velocity differences from various methods.

Comparison Lines ΔvWD (km/s) ΔM (M)
K1D (Hα+Hβ) – (Hα) −0.79 ± 1.42 −0.02 ± 0.03
Gfit –K1D Hα+Hβ −0.63 ± 1.54 −0.01 ± 0.04
Gfit –K1D Hα −0.35 ± 1.54 −0.01 ± 0.03

T3D (Hα+Hβ) – (Hα) −1.52 ± 1.70 −0.03 ± 0.03
Gfit – T3D Hα+Hβ −0.23 ± 2.10 0.00 ± 0.04
Gfit – T3D Hα −0.68 ± 1.45 −0.01 ± 0.03

K1D – T3D (Hα+Hβ) 0.41 ± 0.71 0.01 ± 0.01
K1D – T3D Hα −0.32 ± 0.77 −0.01 ± 0.01
Gfit (Hα+Hβ) – (Hα) −1.07 ± −3.48 −0.02 ± 0.07

LR – K1D (Hα...Hζ) – (Hα+Hβ) 2.85 ± 11.84 0.06 ± 0.23

Notes. K1D and T3D refer to the Koester and Tremblay models, respectively; Gfit corresponds to a Gaussian fit of the Hα or Hα+Hβ performed independently; LR refers to the low-resolution analysis that is performed with the Koester models; the corresponding ΔM are estimated for a typical white dwarf of Teff = 10 000 K and M = 0.61 M.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.