Open Access

Table 3

Cepheid ephemeris, fluxes, and angular diameters of the star sample.

Star P0 (day) T0 (MJD) P˙$\[\dot{P}\]$ (s/yr) ϕMATISSE θLD SPIPS(mas)$\[\theta_{\text {LD }}^{\text {SPIPS}}(\mathrm{mas})\]$ θUD(L)(mas) FL (Jy) FN (Jy)
X Sgr 7.012 56926.825 +0.29 ± 0.01 0.04 1.35 ± 0.03 1.33 ± 0.03 20.1 ± 6.9 4.1 ± 1.2
U Aql 7.023 56935.587 +0.17 ± 0.04 0.88 0.73 ± 0.03 0.71 ± 0.03 7.7 ± 2.7 1.1 ± 0.3
η Aql 7.177 56975.775 +0.25 ± 0.01 0.58 1.80 ± 0.04 1.78 ± 0.04 46.7 ± 6.8 7.5 ± 1.8
β Dor 9.842 50275.770 +0.85 ± 0.11 0.15 1.87 ± 0.04 1.85 ± 0.04 51.9 ± 13.1 7.6 ± 2.3
ζ Gem 10.149 48708.059 −3.12 ± 0.04 0.60 1.61 ± 0.03 1.59 ± 0.03 36.9 ± 2.2 5.1 ± 0.5
TT Aql 13.754 48310.561 −0.70 ± 0.11 0.03 0.76 ± 0.03 0.74 ± 0.03 8.1 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.4
T Mon 27.029 43783.986 +14.49 ± 0.78 0.03 0.87 ± 0.04 0.85 ± 0.04 11.7 ± 2.9 2.0 ± 0.6
U Car 38.791 56886.190 +97.85 ± 2.03 0.22 0.83 ± 0.03 0.82 ± 0.03 12.8 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 1.2

Notes. For X Sgr, U Aql, η Aql, and U Car, we chose the pulsation period P0 and the reference epoch at maximum light T0 from Gaia DR3. For β Dor, ζ Gem, TT Aql, and T Mon, we adopted the SPIPS values. We used an independent rate of the period change P˙$\[\dot{P}\]$ derived by Csörnyei et al. (2022), except for β Dor, for which we adopted the SPIPS value. These data were used to derive the pulsation phase at the epoch of the MATISSE observations ϕMATISSE, and the corresponding LD diameter θLDSPIPS$\[\theta_{\mathrm{LD}}^{\mathrm{SPIPS}}\]$ of each star. The UD diameter in the L band was derived using the tables from Claret & Bloemen (2011).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.