Open Access
Table 2.
Best-fit parameters obtained for the different radial models.
| RA | Dec | qint, maj | ϕ3 | M500 | P0 | rp | a | b | c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | (deg) | (deg) | (–) | (deg) | (1014 M⊙) | (10−2 keV cm−3) | (kpc) | (–) | (–) | (–) |
| RM1 | 109.3806 | 37.7583 | 1 | – | 18.1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| RM2 | 109.3872 | 37.7530 | 1 | – | 21.7 | – | – | – | – | – |
| RM3 | 109.3878 | 37.7528 | 0.77 | 23 | 26.5 | – | – | – | – | – |
| RM4 | 109.3874 | 37.7525 | 0.74 | 24 | – | 11.7 | 852 | – | – | – |
| RM5 | 109.3870 | 37.7543 | 0.71 | 21 | – | 10.5 | 463 | 6.6 | 7.4 | 0.06 |
Notes. Uncertainties on the radial model parameters are negligible compared to the systematic effects associated with the choice of the model, and are thus omitted. The results shown here were obtained using the non-linear least square method.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.