Fig. A.2.

Download original image
Comparison of Bayes factors between warm absorber models. The Bayes factor for the warm absorption model is shown on the horizontal axis, while the Bayes factor for the neutral partial covering model is shown on the vertical axis. The dashed grey line shows the one-to-one relation, with sources lying below the line being better fit with the PL+WA model, and sources above the line being better fit with the PL+PCF model. Sources which do not show evidence for any complex absorption are shown in grey. The values of Kwa = 1.126 and Kpcf = 1.555 correspond to purities of 97.5%.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.