Open Access

Table D.1.

Best-fitting simulation windows.

Model Incl. LCCF win. (i) ( χ o 2 $ \chi^2_\mathrm{o} $ < 8) (ii) ( χ f 2 $ \chi^2_\mathrm{f} $ < 8) (iii) ( χ o 2 $ \chi^2_\mathrm{o} $ < 8) (iv) ( χ o 2 $ \chi^2_\mathrm{o} $ < 7) Best
[rg/c] & ( χ f 2 $ \chi^2_\mathrm{f} $ < 25) & ( χ f 2 $ \chi^2_\mathrm{f} $ < 7) window
MADP 10° 100 121 [13.6%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] -
10° 200 78 [8.9%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] -
10° 300 116 [13.3%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] -
10° 400 174 [20.2%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 100 198 [22.2%] 0 [0.0%] 3 [0.3%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 200 199 [22.6%] 4 [0.5%] 20 [2.3%] 2 [0.2%] 11810, 13180
30° 300 224 [25.7%] 0 [0.0%] 2 [0.2%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 400 245 [28.5%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] -
50° 100 196 [22.0%] 0 [0.0%] 1 [0.1%] 0 [0.0%] -
50° 200 217 [24.6%] 2 [0.2%] 5 [0.6%] 1 [0.1%] 12790
50° 300 252 [28.9%] 1 [0.1%] 10 [1.1%] 0 [0.0%] -
50° 400 288 [33.4%] 7 [0.8%] 17 [2.0%] 0 [0.0%] -

MAD0 10° 100 180 [20.2%] 0 [0.0%] 4 [0.4%] 0 [0.0%] -
10° 200 191 [21.7%] 1 [0.1%] 10 [1.1%] 0 [0.0%] -
10° 300 191 [21.9%] 7 [0.8%] 26 [3.0%] 2 [0.2%] 9910 - 9920
10° 400 171 [19.9%] 19 [2.2%] 28 [3.3%] 3 [0.3%] 7920 - 7930, 10410
30° 100 197 [22.1%] 0 [0.0%] 6 [0.7%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 200 184 [20.9%] 6 [0.7%] 20 [2.3%] 2 [0.2%] 7560, 9130
30° 300 168 [19.3%] 14 [1.6%] 35 [4.0%] 6 [0.7%] 9910, 10330-10370
30° 400 196 [22.8%] 31 [3.6%] 55 [6.4%] 8 [0.9%] 10310-10360, 11270-11280
50° 100 238 [26.7%] 0 [0.0%] 6 [0.7%] 0 [0.0%] -
50° 200 222 [25.2%] 8 [0.9%] 30 [3.4%] 2 [0.2%] 10350-10360
50° 300 235 [27.0%] 27 [3.1%] 47 [5.4%] 7 [0.8%] 9080-9090, 10350-10390
50° 400 267 [31.0%] 43 [5.0%] 61 [7.1%] 3 [0.3%] 9860, 10370-10380

slow 30° 100 49 [18.1%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] -
MAD0 30° 200 69 [27.5%] 0 [0.0%] 8 [3.2%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 300 78 [33.8%] 0 [0.0%] 1 [0.4%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 400 93 [44.1%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] 0 [0.0%] -

MADM 10° 100 74 [8.3%] 0 [0.0%] 1 [0.1%] 0 [0.0%] -
10° 200 76 [8.6%] 0 [0.0%] 6 [0.7%] 0 [0.0%] -
10° 300 85 [9.8%] 2 [0.2%] 16 [1.8%] 0 [0.0%] -
10° 400 82 [9.5%] 5 [0.6%] 5 [0.6%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 100 162 [18.2%] 0 [0.0%] 2 [0.2%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 200 182 [20.7%] 1 [0.1%] 6 [0.7%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 300 184 [21.1%] 3 [0.3%] 2 [0.2%] 0 [0.0%] -
30° 400 237 [27.5%] 0 [0.0%] 11 [1.3%] 0 [0.0%] -
50° 100 224 [25.1%] 0 [0.0%] 5 [0.6%] 0 [0.0%] -
50° 200 237 [26.9%] 1 [0.1%] 3 [0.3%] 0 [0.0%] -
50° 300 310 [35.6%] 4 [0.5%] 22 [2.5%] 2 [0.2%] 9100-9110
50° 400 368 [42.7%] 11 [1.3%] 39 [4.5%] 6 [0.7%] 8990, 9010-9040, 14450

Notes. The total number of LCCF windows per light curve are 891, 881, 871, and 861 that correspond to a length of 100, 200, 300, and 400rg/c, respectively. The "best window" column lists the starting time of the window in question. We note that the slow light case, slow MAD0, has a shorter light curve length and is evaluated at a higher cadence of 5rg/c; see Fig. 8.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.