Table 3
Pearson coefficients of the strength correlations between all queries and matches in the present work.
4963 | 5512 | 5780 | 5797 | 5850 | 6196 | 6379 | 6614 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4963 | 0.994 | 0.906 | ... | 0.828 | 0.879 | ... | 0.637 | 0.659 |
4979 | 0.927 | 0.890 | ... | 0.659 | 0.783 | ... | ... | 0.542 |
4984 | 0.980 | 0.947 | ... | 0.834 | 0.906 | 0.321 | 0.756 | 0.660 |
5062 | 0.963 | 0.845 | ... | 0.619 | 0.705 | ... | 0.685 | 0.453 |
5170 | 0.905 | 0.981 | ... | 0.714 | 0.848 | 0.459 | 0.650 | 0.561 |
5245 | 0.878 | 0.967 | ... | 0.848 | 0.918 | ... | ... | 0.752 |
5418 | 0.965 | 0.872 | ... | 0.600 | 0.745 | ... | 0.542 | 0.397 |
5494 | 0.829 | 0.799 | ... | 0.975 | 0.939 | 0.909 | 0.925 | 0.931 |
5512 | 0.930 | 0.990 | ... | 0.848 | 0.903 | 0.144 | 0.769 | 0.654 |
5545 | 0.773 | 0.507 | ... | 0.983 | 0.963 | ... | ... | 0.927 |
5546 | ... | 0.982 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.787 | ... |
5705 | ... | ... | 0.981 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
5720 | 0.784 | 0.779 | ... | 0.985 | 0.902 | ... | ... | 0.910 |
5762 | 0.688 | 0.847 | ... | 0.927 | 0.953 | 0.763 | 0.933 | 0.777 |
5766 | 0.774 | 0.811 | ... | 0.991 | 0.966 | ... | 0.966 | 0.917 |
5780 | ... | ... | 1.000 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
5793 | 0.806 | ... | ... | 0.932 | 0.948 | ... | ... | 0.817 |
5797 | 0.811 | 0.799 | ... | 0.999 | 0.977 | ... | 0.978 | 0.940 |
5850 | 0.885 | 0.919 | ... | 0.980 | 0.998 | ... | 0.925 | 0.863 |
5911 | 0.794 | 0.863 | ... | 0.960 | 0.950 | ... | 0.941 | 0.823 |
5947 | ... | 0.811 | ... | ... | ... | 0.802 | 0.966 | ... |
6090 | ... | 0.805 | ... | 0.954 | ... | 0.834 | 0.984 | 0.808 |
6117 | 0.844 | 0.888 | ... | 0.969 | 0.972 | ... | ... | 0.891 |
6140 | ... | 0.841 | ... | 0.977 | 0.975 | 0.822 | 0.975 | 0.848 |
6196 | ... | 0.359 | ... | ... | ... | 0.999 | 0.906 | ... |
6330 | ... | 0.672 | ... | 0.878 | ... | 0.911 | 0.940 | 0.947 |
6379 | ... | 0.749 | ... | 0.930 | 0.821 | 0.900 | 1.000 | 0.879 |
6426 | ... | 0.673 | ... | ... | ... | 0.973 | 0.905 | ... |
6440 | ... | 0.829 | ... | ... | ... | 0.956 | 0.959 | 0.963 |
6445 | 0.405 | 0.537 | ... | 0.925 | 0.831 | 0.975 | 0.898 | 0.979 |
6521 | 0.632 | 0.527 | ... | 0.897 | 0.802 | 0.969 | 0.775 | 0.989 |
6614 | 0.662 | 0.334 | ... | 0.939 | 0.851 | ... | 0.872 | 0.999 |
6623 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.955 | 0.831 | ... |
Notes. The displayed correlations are calculated from matches with distances smaller than 0.35. If there are less than 50 matches using that cut, no values are displayed. The same maximum distance is used for all correlations to make them comparable. We note that some DIB profile families are very similar, in particular those with queries 5797 and 5850 Å. But upon closer inspection – including the profile comparison – these families show subtle but distinct differences, in particular when comparing the queries directly. The proposed DIB blend at 6440 Å shows high band strength correlations with the 6379 Å DIB, but on visual inspection the profiles are different.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.