Table 1.
Summary of the properties of our data set and the comparison samples shown in Fig. 2 and described in Sect. 3.
z | log M⋆ | i − H | b − i | ΔMS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(M⊙) | (mag) | (mag) | (dex) | ||
Mass-complete samples | |||||
This work | 1.9![]() |
8.6![]() |
0.81![]() |
0.12![]() |
![]() |
COSMOS2020* (W22) | 1.8![]() |
9.0![]() |
0.85![]() |
0.59![]() |
![]() |
Individual (sub-)mm detections + stacks | |||||
T20 | 1.4![]() |
10.6![]() |
1.87![]() |
0.95![]() |
![]() |
Individual (sub-)mm detections | |||||
Super-deblended (K21) | 1.6![]() |
10.4![]() |
1.85![]() |
1.24![]() |
![]() |
A3COSMOS (L19) | 2.1![]() |
10.7![]() |
1.89![]() |
1.24![]() |
![]() |
GG22 | 2.2![]() |
10.5![]() |
1.98![]() |
0.82![]() |
![]() |
Notes. The comparison samples are limited to the redshifts and stellar masses studied in this work. The values here shown correspond to the median and first and third quartiles. The names between brackets refer to the scaling relations that are based on each data set (see Sect. 5.2). W22 refers to the Wang et al. (2022) relation, K21 to the relation from Kokorev et al. (2021), and L19 to that of Liu et al. (2019a). The T20 data set was used in that same work to obtain their scaling relation.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.