Table 4.
Comparison of the rotation periods obtained as part of the present study with the results published by Hermes et al. (2017, their Table 4), Romero et al. (2022, their Table 8), and O’Donoghue et al. (1992).
| TIC ID (other ID) | Prot [h] | Reference | Prot [h] |
|---|---|---|---|
| literature | This work | ||
| 0007675859 | 5.2 | Romero et al. (2022) | 6.6 |
| 0029854433 (Ross 548) | 37.8 | Hermes et al. (2017) | 39.3 |
| 0101014997 (BPM 31594) | 21.6 | O’Donoghue et al. (1992) | 11.9 |
| 0149863849 | No data | Romero et al. (2022) | 24.5 |
| 0188087204 | No data | Romero et al. (2022) | 16.5 |
| 0199666369 (G 226-29) | 8.9 | Hermes et al. (2017) | 9.1 |
| 0262872628 (L 19-2) | 13.0 | Hermes et al. (2017) | 12.2 |
| 0343296348 | 24.5 | Romero et al. (2022) | 24.2 |
| 0394015496 | 29.8 | Romero et al. (2022) | 29.4 |
| 0455094688 (HS 0507+0434B) | 40.9 | Hermes et al. (2017) | 47.5 |
Notes. TIC ID refers to the TESS Input Catalog identifier of the object. If another common identifier is available, it is also given in parentheses. Prot literature refers to a measurement from a previous work.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.