Open Access

Table B.1.

Overview of some studies of individual LyC leakers at high redshift. The subscript rel. means relative escape fraction, abs. means absolute. If the information is not given in the subscript it is not clear from the paper. It has to be noted though that the definition of escape fraction also is not uniform, which explains some of the discrepancies.

object(s) paper(s) redshift fesc, LyC notes
C49 Shapley et al. (2006), Siana et al. (2015) z = 3.15 fesc, rel = 65% in the field SSA 22a, but reexamined by Siana et al. (2015) (foreground contamination)

D3 Shapley et al. (2006) z = 3.07 fesc, rel ≥ 100% in the field SSA 22a

Ion1 Vanzella et al. (2010a), Vanzella et al. (2012), Vanzella et al. (2015), Vanzella et al. (2020), Ji et al. (2020) z = 3.794 fesc, abs = 5 ± 2%, fesc, rel = 32 ± 11% from Ji et al. (2020), who also stack 107 galaxies but find no LyC signal

Ion2 Vanzella et al. (2015), Vanzella et al. (2016), de Barros et al. (2016), Vanzella et al. (2020) z = 3.212 from de Barros et al. 2016

Ion3 Vanzella et al. (2018) z = 4.0 fesc, rel ≈ 60%

MD5b Mostardi et al. (2015) z ≈ 3.14 fesc, rel = 75 − 100% follow-up of Mostardi et al. (2013)

Q1549-C25 Shapley et al. (2016) z = 3.15 fesc, abs > 51%

Horseshoe Vasei et al. (2016) z = 2.38 fesc, rel < 0.08 non detection in lensed galaxy

A2218-Flanking Bian et al. (2017) z = 2.5 fesc, abs > 28 − 57%

GN-UVC-6 Jones et al. (2018) z = 2.439 6 candidates, one AGN, 4 contaminations

Sunburst arc Rivera-Thorsen et al. (2017a), Rivera-Thorsen et al. (2019), Vanzella et al. (2020), Mainali et al. (2022) z = 2.37 lensed, values from Rivera-Thorsen et al. (2019)

AUDFs01 Saha et al. (2020) z = 1.42 fesc, rel > 20% observed with AstroSat, near the peak of star formation

J0121+0025 Marques-Chaves et al. (2021) z = 3.244 fesc, abs ≈ 40% very luminous with a young star burst

J1316-2614 Marques-Chaves et al. (2022) z = 3.613 fesc, abs ≈ 90% UV-bright starburst

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.