Open Access

Table 1.

Coefficients of the corrections ΔTeff and Δlog g of the four investigated references.

ΔTeff
Δlog g
a b σ a b σ N
(%) (%)
Anders et al. (2019, 2022)
CP1 +896(616) −0.123(77) 3.6 +1.46(50) −0.377(126) 4.3 54
CP2 12.7 8.9 83
CP3 +8554(1276) −0.664(114) 8.8 2.45(54) −0.623(136) 4.9 49
CP4 17.4 10.8 8

Stassun et al. (2019)
CP1 2.2 +1.53(25) −0.387(63) 3.8 102
CP2 +1698(496) −0.157(48) 9.2 +3.77(61) −0.953(156) 8.9 125
CP3 +7986(725) −0.617(62) 8.6 +2.50(68) −0.633(173) 4.8 86
CP4 +10 377(1426) −0.695(90) 10.8 10

Fouesneau et al. (2023)
CP1 ( K) 2.2 +2.30(43) −0.569(110) 4.5 58
CP2 11.7 +3.32(79) −0.832(202) 15.5 71
CP3 +5491(1154) −0.411(97) 8.3 +3.00(35) −0.764(92) 6.2 65
CP4 +2707 12.5 8.6 9

Zhang et al. (2023)
CP1 +4283(288) −0.552(35) 4.5 +2.79(15) −0.705(39) 4.1 74
CP2 +5613(237) −0.659(17) 7.7 +3.19(16) −0.773(46) 8.8 93
CP3 +10 592(619) −0.891(36) 9.9 +3.41(14) −0.842(42) 5.4 63
CP4 +11 990(2531) −0.768(132) 8.2 +3.69(16) −0.899(52) 4.6 13

Notes. The meaning is ) and log gcorr = a + log gpubl + (blog gpubl). The values by Stassun et al. (2019) could not be checked for the log g of CP4 stars because they include an insufficient number of objects. If no values a and b are listed, the published astrophysical parameters can be used as they are. The quantity σ gives the standard deviation of the calibrated parameter from the ‘standard value’ from Ghazaryan et al. (2018, 2019) in per cent. The errors in the final digits of the corresponding quantity are given in parentheses.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.