Open Access

Table 1

Selected molecules from this work compared to Murchison SOM in terms of (relative) sum abundances of functional groups.

Species SOM conc. (ppm) SOM rel. to acids 67P est. abundance 67P rel. to acids
Carboxylic acids >300 1 142 1
Hydroxycarboxylic acids 15 0.05 xxx(b) xxx(b)
Dicarboxylic acids and hydroxydicarboxylic acids 14 0.05 xxx(b) xxx(b)
Esters linear 59 0.42
Esters cyclic/lactones(c) 78 0.55
Aldehydes 27 0.09 516 3.63
Ketones 217 1.52
Alcohols 11 0.04 223 1.57
Polyols >8 0.03 76 0.53
Ethers linear 83 0.58
Ethers cyclic(a) 191 1.34
Peroxides 4 0.03

Notes. (a)Murchison SOM has been reviewed in Botta & Bada (2002) and Alexander et al. (2017) and literature cited therein. Here, we consider the values listed in Table 1 in Alexander et al. (2017). (b)Expected M signals of hydroxy-, di-, and hydroxydicarboxylic acids seem to be absent or below DFMS detections limits, which is indicated by XXX.(c)Cyclic esters and ethers are so-called O-bearing heterocycles.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.