Open Access
Table 4
Mean and standard deviations of Eros and Itokawa composition predictions together with Itokawa particle laboratory analyses.
| Label | Eros | Itokawa | Itokawa lab. |
|---|---|---|---|
| OL (vol%) | 57.6 ± 4.5 | 69.0 ± 1.5 | 75.2 |
| OPX (vol%) | 28.9 ± 1.8 | 27.0 ± 1.7 | 21.5 |
| CPX (vol%) | 13.5 ± 4.1 | 4.0 ± 1.9 | 3.3 |
| Fa | 22.8 ± 1.1 | 23.1 ± 0.7 | 28.4 ± 1.2 |
| Fs (OPX) | 21.9 ± 3.6 | 22.8 ± 0.4 | 23.4 ± 2.0 |
| Fs (CPX) | 10.1 ± 0.6 | 21.3 ± 1.4 | 9.0 ± 1.5 |
| En (CPX) | 49.6 ± 2.2 | 35.8 ± 1.5 | 43.2 ± 4.3 |
| Wo (CPX) | 40.4 ± 2.2 | 43.0 ± 0.8 | 47.9 ± 2.9 |
| Q(%) | 8.5 ± 5.5 | 19.6 ± 9.1 | – |
| S(%) | 89.5 ± 5.3 | 80.0 ± 9.0 | – |
Notes. Itokawa particle analyses were adopted from Nakamura et al. (2014) and Tsuchiyama et al. (2014). Modal mineral compositions are always normalised to OL + OPX + CPX = 100 vol%.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.