Notes.— Best-fitting model parameters for LeMMINGs galaxies from our 1D (major-axis) and 2D decompositions (see Figs. D.1 and E.1). Unless labelled otherwise, we present 1D best-fitting parameters. Shown are the galaxy name, the HST instrument and filter, the goodness of the fit, the number and nature of the fitted components, and the ground-based data at large radii for galaxies with composite profiles, that is inner HST plus outer ground-based data. Bulgeless galaxies are indicated by the superscript ‘†’. Quality flag ‘1’ indicates fits with good or higher quality levels whereas those labelled ‘2’ are questionable primarily as a result of the difficulty in modelling highly inclined (i ≳ 75°) galaxies, see the text for further detail. For each 2D galaxy component, we present the best-fitting IMFIT ellipticity (ϵ) and position angle (P.A.). The IMFIT ‘boxy’ and ‘discy’ parameter c₀ is shown for 2D fits that were performed using generalised ellipses (Erwin 2015). We do not show the errors on the best-fitting 2D parameters from IMFIT as they are unrealistically low, see Erwin (2015). The fitted models (see Section 3.1) are: Sérsic Bulge (μ_e, R_e [arcsec], R_e [kiloparsec], n), Sérsic model for galaxy components other than the bulge (μ_e, R_e [arcsec], n), exponential model (μ_disc, 0, h [arcsec]), and 2-parameter Gaussian function (μ_Gauss, 0, m_Gauss). μ_disc, 0 and h are central surface brightness and scale length of the large-scale exponential disc. μ_Gauss, 0 and m_Gauss are central surface brightness and apparent magnitude of nuclear components modelled with a 2-parameter Gaussian function. The surface brightnesses (μ) are in units of mag arcsec⁻², where the magnitudes are given in the Vega magnitude system. Unless specified otherwise, the errors associated with μ_e, R_e, n, μ_disc, 0, h, μ_Gauss, 0, and m_Gauss are 0.24, 15%, 15%, 0.28, 20%, 0.2, and 0.3, respectively. Sources: (a) Dullo et al. (2016); (b) Dullo & Graham (2014); (c) Dullo et al. (2018). The full table is available at the CDS.