Comparisons of the constraints on A_lens with previous measurements. Our baseline analysis “with SC” is consistent with 1. We also show some cases where IA is ignored in the analysis and if IA is considered but the A_IA − A_lens degeneracy is not broken with SC. These main results in blue are similar to what is shown in Fig. 12. We show tests with different scale cuts and different treatments to magnification, the boost factor, and different (KiDS) fiducial cosmologies in red. We make a comparison with other works, divided into that ignoring IA (orange) and that assuming a strong prior of IA (green). We note that for different works, the different fiducial cosmologies (the “Planck”, “WMAP,” and “KiDS” labels on the y-axis) can lead to ∼10% difference in A_lens.