Open Access

Fig. A.1.

image

Download original image

Comparison of effective radii as measured with this work procedures vs. van der Wel et al. (2014) estimates adopted for the field reference sample. Measurements are compared for a random portion of the control field galaxy sample (see text), split by Sersic index as indicated. The solid lines show the bisector (middle), and the expected average uncertainty (1σ) on effective radii from this work, as estimated with simulations (see Sect. 2.4) for sources at the faint end of the probed magnitude range.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.