Table 1.
Comparison of core and surface rotation rates obtained with MOLA and eMOLA inversions.
| Core | Surface | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Profile | Method | rotation | rotation |
| [nHz] | [nHz] | ||
| Core step | eMOLA | 690 ± 6 | 102 ± 6 |
| eMOLA | 686 ± 6 | 128 ± 7 | |
| Envelope step | eMOLA | 749 ± 6 | 100 ± 6 |
| eMOLA | 745 ± 6 | 129 ± 7 | |
| Convective power law | eMOLA | 750 ± 6 | 152 ± 6 |
| eMOLA | 747 ± 6 | 179 ± 7 | |
| Input | 750 | 100 | |
Notes. The profile type used to compute the synthetic rotational splittings is given in the first column. Core and surface rotation rates have been calculated with target radii of r0/R = 0.003 and r0/R = 0.98, respectively. The last row contains the input values for core and surface rotation rates in the different profiles.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.