Open Access

Table B.1

Properties of atomic absorption features detected in transmission spectra of ultra-hot Jupiters.

HAT-P-70b KELT-9b MASCARA-2b MASCARA-4b WASP-76b WASP-121b WASP-189b
Rp/R* 0.099 0.082 0.113 0.087 0.109 0.125 0.061
Teq (K) 2562 ± 52 3921 ± 182 2260 ± 50 2250 ± 62 2228 ± 120 2358 ± 52 2641 ±31
T* (K) 8450 ± 690 9600 ± 400 8980 ± 130 7800 ± 200 6329 ± 65 6586 ± 59 8000 ± 100
Rp (RJup) 1.87 ±0.15 1.926 ±0.047 1.83 ±0.07 1.515 ±0.044 1.863 ± 0.083 1.865 ± 0.044 1.619 ±0.021
Mp (MJup) < 6.78 2.88 ± 0.35 < 3.5 1.675 ±0.241 0.894 ± 0.014 1.183 ±0.064 1.99 ±0.16
H0 (km) > 184 704 ± 95 > 302 430 ± 66 1206 ± 102 967 ± 65 485 ±40
h Hα (%) 1.560 ±0.150 1.150 ±0.050 0.765 ± 0.090 -0.317 ±0.021 < 0.470 1.700 ± 0.048 0.13 ±0.02
FWHM Hα(km s−1) 34.1 ±3.9 51.2 ±2.6 20.8 ± 3.4 31.4 ±2.4 - 40.9 ± 1.7 27.4 ± 4.6
h Fe I (%) 0.037 ± 0.003 0.016 ± 0.001 0.013 ± 0.002 0.0150 ±0.0001 0.049 ± 0.003 0.039 ± 0.002 0.0075 ± 0.0004
FWHM Fe I (km s−1) 9.7 ± 1.0 20.1 ± 1.0 12.39 ± 1.69 22.5 ± 0.2 8.6 ± 0.7 15.9 ± 1.1 15.3 ± 1.0
A Fen (%) 0.437 ± 0.017 0.183 ±0.004 0.130 ±0.011 0.0444 ±0.0011 < 0.063 - 0.023 ± 0.002
FWHM Fe II (km s−1) 13.7 ±0.6 21.8 ±0.7 8.54 ± 0.87 16.5 ± 0.4 - - 14.1 ± 1.2
h Na I D(%) 0.655 ±0.150 > 0.095 ± 0.007 0.320 ± 0.050 0.191 ±0.017 0.360 ± 0.050 0.480 ± 0.047 0.153 ±0.031
h Mg I (%) 0.131 ±0.018 0.056 ± 0.005 0.062 ± 0.005 0.0221 ± 0.0009 0.114 ±0.016 0.123 ±0.015 0.018 ±0.002
h Ca II(%) 3.750 ± 0.370 0.780 ± 0.040 0.560 ±0.050 0.775 ± 0.082 2.440 ± 0.340 4.700 ±0.180 0.40 ± 0.05
References (1),(2) (3)–(10) (11)–(15) (16)–(18) (19)–(24) (25)–(28) (29)–(31)

Notes. For the calculation of the lower atmosphere scale height H0, we assume a mean molecular weight µ of 2.3. The amplitude of Na I absorption (h Nal D) takes the average value of the Nal doublet at 5891 and 5897 A. The h Can takes the average value of the Can H & K lines at 3969 and 3934 A. Properties of Mg I, Fe I, and Fe π are taken from cross-correlation outcomes.

References. (1) Zhou et al. (2019), (2) Bello-Arufe et al. (2022), (3) Gaudi et al. (2017), (4) Yan & Henning (2018), (5) Cauley et al. (2019), (6) Borsa et al. (2019), (7) Hoeijmakers et al. (2019), (8) Yan et al. (2019), (9) Turner et al. (2020), (10) Wyttenbach et al. (2020), (11) Talens et al. (2018), (12) Casasayas-Barris et al. (2020), (13) Hoeijmakers et al. (2020a), (14) Nugroho et al. (2020), (15) Stangret et al. (2020), (16) Dorval et al. (2020), (17) Ahlers et al. (2020), (18) this work, (19) West et al. (2016), (20) Ehrenreich et al. (2020), (21) Tabernero et al. (2021), (22) Seidel et al. (2021), (23) Casasayas-Barris et al. (2021), (24) Kesseli et al. (2022), (25) Delrez et al. (2016), (26) Cabot et al. (2020), (27) Hoeijmakers et al. (2020b), (28) Borsa et al. (2021), (29) Anderson et al. (2018), (30) Prinoth et al. (2022), (31) Stangret et al. (2022).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.