Open Access

Fig. 6

image

Download original image

Results of experiment in Sect. 5.1: We compare the output of the PCA-based PSF subtraction approach with two versions of the half-sibling regression-based algorithm on four different data sets obtained with VLT/NACO. The images show the signal estimates in units of flux (i.e., in the same units as the input data). The numbers that label the planets are the respective −log10(FPF) scores. The sub- and superscripted values refer to the uncertainties due to the placement of the reference positions used for computing the FPF. We find that for all planets, the HSR-based method achieves a higher −log10(FPF) score than PCA.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.