Table 4
RV-only model comparison using the Bayesian log evidence for TOI-1201.
| Model | P (d) |  |
 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat | … | –116.70 | –18.31 |
| 1 Kep + 1 Sin + dSHO-GP19d | 2.5, 102 | -98.39 | 0.0 |
| 1 Kep + 1 Sin + dSHO-GP19d | 2.5 (*), 102 | –99.38 | –0.99 |
| 2 Kep + dSHO-GP19d | 2.5, 88 (*) | –98.55 | –0.16 |
| 1 Kep + Quad + dSHO-GP19d | 2.5 | –116.99 | –18.61 |
| 1 Kep + 2 Sin | 2.5, 19, 104 | –100.24 | –1.85 |
Notes. A larger, positive 
indicates a better model. In the model names, “Kep” refers to a Keplerian orbit and “Sin” to a sinusoidal signal. The model that we used for the final joint fit was the 1 Kep (2.5 d) + 1 Sin (102 d) + dSHO-GP19d, indicated by the bold-faced row. The model names correspond to those in Fig. D.2. (*)An eccentric orbit was used.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.