Table 2.
Pulsar geometry as derived from fitting the gamma-ray light curves.
Pulsar | αTPC | ζTPC | αOG | ζOG |
---|---|---|---|---|
(deg) | (deg) | (deg) | (deg) | |
J0002+6216* | 47 | 67 | 81 | 67 |
J0007+7303 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 79 |
J0106+4855* | 65![]() |
89![]() |
90 | 89 |
J0357+3205 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 80 |
J0359+5414 | 3 | 0 | 89 | 19 |
J0554+3107 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 77 |
J0622+3749 | 9 | 69 | 6 | 80 |
J0631+0646* | – | – | – | – |
J0633+0632 | 74![]() |
85![]() |
90 | 88 |
J1836+5925 | 28 | 85 | 5 | 77 |
J1838−0537 | 10 | 69 | 13 | 78 |
J1846+0919 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 73 |
J1906+0722 | 30 | 67 | 74 | 17 |
J1907+0602* | 45 | 66 | 82 | 59![]() |
J1932+1916 | 3 | 0 | 90 | 20 |
J1954+2836 | 62 | 77 | 8 | 80 |
J1957+5033 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 73 |
J1958+2846 | 33 | 69 | 31 | 78 |
J2017+3625 | 51 | 71 | 15 | 80 |
J2021+4026 | 62 | 26 | 29 | 89 |
J2028+3332 | 28 | 69 | 40 | 87 |
J2030+4415 | 72 | 89 | 72 | 87 |
J2032+4127* | 88 | 77 | 85 | 84 |
J2055+2539 | 14 | 69 | 66 | 25 |
J2111+4606 | 13 | 69 | 11 | 79 |
J2139+4716 | 21 | 66 | 19 | 80 |
J2238+5903 | 90 | 84 | 89 | 87 |
Notes. Column 1: name of the pulsar (pulsars with know radio emission are denoted with *). Columns 2 and 3: best-fit values for the angles α and ζ for the TPC model. Columns 4 and 5: same as Cols. 2 and 3, but for the OG model. Unless otherwise stated, the error was considered to be ±10.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.