Table C.1
Best-fit results for a power-law LD model, including bandwidth smearing, fitted to the Canopus AMBER low resolution (LR) data.
| Power-law LD with bandwidth smearing | ||
|---|---|---|
| AMBER | Parameters |  |
| LR | (total/V2/CP) | |
| H band | ⊘H = 7.31 ± 0.05 ± 0.15 mas | 12.3/7.7/4.6 |
| αH = 0.12 ± 0.03 | ||
| K band | ⊘K = 7.33 ± 0.09 ± 0.11 mas | 16.6/15.2/1.4 |
| αK = 0.16 ± 0.05 | ||
Notes. Best-fit results for a power-law LD model (defined in Table 2), including bandwidth smearing, fitted to the Canopus AMBER LR data: H band (3495 data points: 2619 V2 and 876 CP) and K band (3911 data points: 2933 V2 and 978 CP). The best-fit parameter values correspond to medians obtained from the histograms provided by emcee. The second values correspond to statistical uncertainties. The third values given for the angular diameters ⊘H and ⊘K are the systematical errors associated with the instrumental wavelength calibration of AMBER (see Sect. 2.1.3). We also provide the reduced chi-square,
, for the whole data set andfor the V2 and CP data alone.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.