Open Access

Table A.3.

Spectral fitting methods applied to IOM spectra.

% Positive Identifications for 10,000 Fits
IOM Name ID Individual - Linear ID Individual - K-S ID as IOM - Linear ID as IOM - K-S
Cold Bokkeveld 92.19 51.65 100 100
DOM08006 93.7 94.35 100 99.99
GRO95577 41.88 27.47 100 99.99
QUE97008 100 99.86 100 99.86
Tag_UA_11h 92.06 68.85 100 99.97
Tagish_CCL 48.08 23.52 100 99.99
Tagish_DM 99.4 95.32 100 99.98
Tagish_Lake 94.38 95.72 100 100
ALH83100 45.82 21.19 100 99.98
ALH85013 46.14 31.01 100 100
Bells 59.86 22.14 100 100
GRO95566 30.77 19.72 100 99.99
LEW85311 38.49 31.42 100 100
MET01070 36.32 35.63 100 99.99
Mighei 45.91 40.21 100 99.94
Murchison 42.2 23.05 100 99.99
Orgueil 53.87 28.43 100 100
Y86720 95.42 99.32 95.42 99.32

Notes. Results of our two spectral fitting methods, linear least-squares (linear) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S), when applied to IOM spectra with 10,000 randomly generated noise profiles simulating OVIRS noise. “ID individual” refers to cases in which the noise-added laboratory spectrum is best fit with its noise-free counterpart (i.e., an exact match); “ID as IOM” refers to cases where the noise-added laboratory spectrum is best fit with another IOM spectrum (as opposed to a different laboratory endmember, e.g., a calcite), which is true nearly 100% of the time.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.