Table 7.
Comparison of the γ-ray (hadronic) flux prediction obtained by Ackermann et al. (2014) and this work, using the same value for the CR-to-thermal energy ratio.
| Cluster | XCRp(R200) | Ackermann et al. (2014) | Reference model | Applying Uth rescaling | Gas density to β-model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | (10−10 cm−2 s−1) | ||||
| A1795 | 0.022 | 3.01 | 0.81 | 3.71 | 3.46 |
| A2142 | 0.028 | 3.45 | 1.60 | 4.11 | 4.14 |
| A2255 | 0.022 | 0.85 | 0.37 | 0.83 | 0.88 |
Notes. We have converted the pressure ratio into an energy ratio as defined in this work. Fluxes are given for energies E > 500 MeV, in units of s−1 cm−2. The integration radius was set to the truncation radius (total volume). Uth was rescaled using Eq. (48).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.