Table 15.
Number of red (super)giant stars and yellow supergiants, (Cepheids or not, in brackets) in open clusters with ages between 50 and 150 Ma (from Mermilliod et al. 2008).
Cluster | log τ | NRSG | Cluster | log τ | NRSG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGC 0129 | 7.90 | 0 (1) | NGC 6087 | 8.00 | 0 (1) | |
NGC 0225 | 8.11 | 0 | NGC 6124 | 8.15 | 7 | |
NGC 0436 | 7.93 | 1 (1) | NGC 6192 | 8.13 | 5 | |
NGC 1647 | 8.16 | 2 | NGC 6405 | 7.97 | 1 | |
NGC 1778 | 8.16 | 1 | NGC 6416 | 8.09 | 0 | |
NGC 2168 | 7.98 | 2 (1) | NGC 6520 | 7.72 | 2 (1) | |
NGC 2186 | 7.74 | 1 | NGC 6546 | 7.89 | 1 | |
NGC 2232 | 7.73 | 0 | NGC 6649( * ) | 7.80 | 2 (2) | |
NGC 2323 | 8.10 | 0 | NGC 6664( * ) | 7.85 | 2 (1) | |
NGC 2345 | 7.75( * ) | 5 | NGC 6694 | 7.93 | 2 | |
NGC 2354 | 8.13 | 10 | NGC 6709 | 8.18 | 2 | |
NGC 2422 | 7.86 | 0 | NGC 6755 | 7.72 | 3 | |
NGC 2516 | 8.05 | 3 | NGC 7031 | 8.14 | 1 | |
NGC 2546 | 7.87 | 2 | NGC 7063 | 7.98 | 0 | |
NGC 2669 | 7.93 | 1 | NGC 7654 | 7.76 | 0 (1) | |
NGC 2972 | 7.97 | 2 | NGC 7790 | 7.90 | 0 (3) | |
NGC 3033 | 7.85 | 0 | Berkeley 55( * ) | 7.85 | 5 (1) | |
NGC 3114 | 8.09 | 6 (1) | Collinder 258 | 8.03 | 1 | |
NGC 3228 | 7.93 | 0 | IC 2488 | 8.11 | 3 | |
NGC 3247 | 8.08 | 1 | IC 4725 | 7.97 | 1 (1) | |
NGC 4609 | 7.89 | 0 | Melotte 20 | 7.85 | 0 | |
NGC 5138 | 7.99 | 0 | Melotte 101 | 7.89 | 1 | |
NGC 5168 | 8.00 | 0 | Trumpler 2 | 8.17 | 1 | |
NGC 5617 | 7.92 | 3 | Trumpler 3 | 7.83 | 1 | |
NGC 5662 | 7.95 | 2(1) | Trumpler 9 | 8.00 | 0 (1) | |
NGC 5749 | 7.73 | 0 | Trumpler 35( * *) | 7.86 | 0 | |
NGC 6067 | 7.95( * ), ( * *) | 10 (1) | vdBergh 1 | 8.03 | 1 (1) |
Notes. The age of every cluster has been taken from the WEBDA database. ( * )Ages derived by our group in this paper (for NGC 6649, NGC 6664 and Be 55) or in previous works (Alonso-Santiago et al. 2017, 2019b, for NGC 6067 and NGC 2345, respectively). ( * *)According to Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018), Cepheids QZ Nor (NGC 6067) and RU Sct (Trumpler 35) are not considered cluster members and, therefore, to maintain homogeneity, they have not been taken into account in this table. However, the cluster membership of QZ Nor should not be questioned based on the evidence from Majaess et al. (2013), who, unlike Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018), conducted a comprehensive investigation exclusively devoted to clarify this issue.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.