Table 2.
Classification of spectra of all the targets as in Appendix A.
| TYPE | FLAG | FWZI(Hα) | N. SPECTRA (N. DIFFERENT OBJECTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | N | > 14 Å | 218 (62) |
| Bad | Y (for each FEL) | <3 Å | 56 (55) |
| Intermediate with flag for each FEL | Y (for each FEL) | >3 Å | 73 (70), 2 confirmed accretors |
| Intermediate OHαNA with no flag | N | (4−14) Å | 139 (53) |
Notes. All the other cases are intermediate cases to be investigated in more detail. Among the good cases, the spectra showing Hα line in emission (≈90% of the total) are confident accretors. The intermediate OHαNA with no flag in this table are candidate accretors with also S/N > 40 and Hα10% > 200 km s−1 (as in Natta et al. 2004): by a visual inspection case-by-case, ≈90% of these spectra show altered profiles (from the comparison between original and sky-subtracted spectra). A case-by-case investigation of OHαNA objects and their variability is recommended, as described in the main text.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.