Open Access

Table 2.

Sample and archival data II.

Source z Wavelength Sν Survey name Reference
(MHz) (mJy)
J1026+2542 5.2843 ± 0.0006 k
76
84 359.24 ± 129.27
92 315.76 ± 123.45
99 419.46 ± 111.99
107 318.93 ± 100.71
115 269.68 ± 86.41
122 507.62 ± 67.50
130 443.35 ± 61.73
143 456.76 ± 40.78
151 400.49 ± 35.57
158 443.97 ± 32.13
166 405.07 ± 31.00 GLEAM i
174 405.18 ± 39.58
181 431.84 ± 39.13
189 422.07 ± 39.65
197 431.17 ± 42.62
204 476.86 ± 70.88
212 527.16 ± 71.72
220 287.54 ± 72.41
227 450.06 ± 84.39

147.5 450.50 ± 5.90 TGSS j,(1)
151 520.00 7C e
365 406.00 ± 24.00 Texas c
408 328.00 B2 a
1400 239.44 ± 0.14 FIRST h
1700 180.40 g
4830 116.00 ± 6.44 MIT b
4850 142.00 ± 13.00 GB6 d
5000 79.20 CLASS f
8400 105.70 m
15000 55 ± 4 l
31000 33 ± 4 l
43000 55 ± 4 m
91000 14 ± 3 l

Notes. Column 1: source name. Column 2: redshift. Columns 3–4: observed wavelength and its corresponding flux density. Columns 5–6: survey name and the reference.

(1)We cut the source image from TGSS database (Intema et al. 2017), and we measured the flux density and the corresponding error with CASA 2D Gaussian fit tool. The value we present is the same as that in the TGSS online dataset.

References. (a)Colla et al. (1972); (b)Langston et al. (1990); (c)Douglas et al. (1996); (d)Gregory et al. (1996) (e)Waldram et al. (1996); (f)Myers et al. (2003); (g)Frey et al. (2015); (h)Helfand et al. (2015); (i)Hurley-Walker et al. (2017); (j)Intema et al. (2017); (k)SDSS; (l)Sbarrato et al. (2013); (m)Frey et al. (2013).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.