Table 9.
Peak statistics, as defined in Fergusson et al. (2015), for the resonance models, showing the maximum “Raw” peak significance, the “Single” peak significance after accounting for the parameter survey look-elsewhere effect, and the “Multi”-peak statistic integrating across all peaks (also accounting for the look-elsewhere correction).
| SMICA |
SEVEM |
NILC |
Commander |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | Single | Multi | Raw | Single | Multi | Raw | Single | Multi | Raw | Single | Multi | |
| Sin(log) constant T only …… | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Sin(log) constant T+E…… | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Sin(log) equilateral T only…… | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Sin(log) equilateral T+E…… | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Sin(log) flattened T only…… | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| Sin(log) flattened T+E…… | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Sin(log) local T only…… | 1.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Sin(log) local T+E…… | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Notes. This table does not include the results of the high-frequency resonance-model estimator, whose significance was assessed independently and presented in Sect. 5.2.5.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.