Free Access

Table 2

Impact parameters from each study along with the gradient of the slope fit to the literature data (y) and the simulation slopes resulting from the impact parameter degeneracy (y′).

Planet Reference y [×10−6 nm−1 ] y′ [×10−6 nm−1] b
WASP-12b Sing et al. (2013) −1.24 ± 0.25 input 0.39
Stevenson et al. (2014) −3.32 ± 0.62 −0.97 0.48

WASP-80b Parviainen et al. (2018) 0.68 ± 1.28 input 0.16
Kirk et al. (2018) −6.35 ± 2.08 − 0.49 0.20
Sedaghati et al. (2017) −31.05 ± 3.30 − 0.92 0.23

HAT-P-32b Nortmann et al. (2016) 0.94 ± 1.32 input 0.07
Gibson et al. (2013b) −3.79 ± 0.94 −0.07 0.09
Mallonn & Strassmeier (2016) −3.92 ± 0.94 −0.07 0.09

WASP-6b Jordán et al. (2013) −10.56 ± 3.28 input 0.26
Nikolov et al. (2015) −3.69 ± 1.11 −0.14 0.28

Notes. By “input” we denote to the impact parameter value used to create synthetic light curves of a flat spectrum, and y′ is the slope caused by fitting these synthetic light curves with the deviating impact parameter.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.