Table 1
Summary of published spin-state solutions for Interamnia.
| λ1 | β1 | λ2 | β2 | P | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (deg) | (deg) | (deg) | (deg) | (h) | |
| 43 ± 8 | − 21 ± 9 | 224 ± 10 | − 22 ± 10 | – | Michalowski (1993) |
| 47 ± 10 | − 3 ± 10 | 227 ± 10 | 1 ± 10 | – | De Angelis (1995) |
| 51 ± 15 | 22 ± 10 | 8.72729 ± 0.00001 | Michalowski et al. (1995) | ||
| 36 ± 5 | 12 ± 5 | – | Drummond & Christou (2008) | ||
| 47 ± 10 | 66 ± 10 | – | Drummond et al. (2009) | ||
| 259 ± 8 | − 50 ± 5 | 8.728967167 ± 0.000000007 (a) | Satō et al. (2014) | ||
| 87 ± 10 | 63 ± 10 | 226 ± 10 | 43 ± 10 | 8.712355 ± 0.000005 | This work, CI |
| 87 ± 5 | 62 ± 5 | 8.71234 ± 0.00001 | This work, ADAM |
Notes. The table gives the ecliptic longitude λ and latitudeβ of all possible pole solutions with their uncertainties, the sidereal rotation period P, and the reference. Our second pole solution from convex inversion (CI) has been rejected due to inconsistency with the SPHERE images. (a) Such uncertainty in the rotation period is unrealistic.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.