Free Access

Table 2.

Main results of this work for 46 SRs of the sample.

Source Spectral RCO Comments
type (M yr−1) (1015 cm)
VX And C < 1.94−0.68 × 10−9 < 5.61−0.48 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
V370 And M 3.66 11.80 Optically thin emission. SHAPE+shapemol model (see below).
Z Eri M < 8.88−3.31 × 10−10 < 3.26−0.34 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
SS Cep M 4.08 12.40 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
TT Tau C 5.25 16.60 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
W Ori C 5.91 57.30 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
RX Lep M 1.44 7.20 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
Y Tau C 5.79 55.50 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
S Lep M < 9.89−3.47 × 10−10 < 3.97−0.34 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
RY Mon C 3.65 44.30 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
RT Hya M 1.32 2.58 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
RT Cnc M < 4.34−1.50 × 10−10 < 3.13−0.29 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
R Crt M 2.28 27.90 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
Z UMa M < 4.89−2.03 × 10−10 < 1.87−0.31 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
BK Vir M 1.12 6.56 Optically thin emission. SHAPE+shapemol model (see below).
Y UMa M 4.24 12.10 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
Y CVn C 1.92 10.60 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
RT Vir M 4.85 41.40 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
SW Vir M 3.62 35.70 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
RX Boo M 6.49 15.20 Optically thick emission. SHAPE+shapemol model (see below).
τ4 Ser M 2.65 11.70 Optically thin emission. SHAPE+shapemol model (see below).
ST Her M 1.09 19.50 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
X Her M 3.03 10.70 Optically thin emission. Similar to the case of V370 And (see below).
g Her M 6.91 6.85 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
S Dra M 1.26 20.80 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
FI Lyr M 6.15 14.60 Optically thin emission. Similar to the case of BK Vir (see below).
S Sct C 9.02 7.41 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
AF Cyg M 6.29 5.13 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
AQ Sgr C 7.28 19.70 Optically thin emission. SHAPE+shapemol model (see below).
RT Cap C 1.60 9.67 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
UU Dra M 1.90 25.50 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
EU Del M 2.64 5.25 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
U Del M 3.35 11.40 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
IQ Aqr M 5.28 6.38 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
W Cyg M 1.91 8.78 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
RU Cyg M 2.79 30.80 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
EP Aqr M 5.31 14.00 Optically thin emission. Similar to the case of V370 And (see below).
TW Peg M 4.20 12.70 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
SV Lyn M 2.35 3.01 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
SV Peg M 1.07 64.10 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
AK Hya M 7.82 5.85 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
RW Boo M 4.40 13.90 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
IQ Her M 7.73 5.72 Optically thin emission. Overly low mass-loss rate.
AA Cyg S 6.25 17.00 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.
X Cnc C 2.87 40.00 Optically thick emission. Similar to the case of RX Boo (see below).
V465 Cas M 2.11 9.38 Optically thin emission. Low mass-loss rate.

Notes. Description of the columns from left to right. (1) GCVS designation (Samus et al. 2009); (2) spectral type from the GCVS (Samus et al. 2009); (3–4) conclusive mass-loss rate estimate and final photodissociation radius for each source in conformity with a simple test using SHAPE+shapemol (see below); (5) comments.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.