Table 1
Projected and deprojected ring parameters.
This work | IRDIS H (Milli et al. 2017) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Projected ellipse | a′(mas) | 1073 ± 4 | 1064 ± 6 |
b′(mas) | 260 ± 7 | 252 ± 4 | |
Δα(mas) | − 6 ± 4 | − 4 ± 4 | |
Δδ(mas) | − 27 ± 4 | − 28 ± 5 | |
PA(°) | 27.9 ± 0.2 | 27.69 ± 0.26 | |
Deprojected ellipse | a(mas) | 1076 ± 6 | 1066 ± 6 |
e | 0.072 ± 0.037 | 0.070 ± 0.011 | |
i(°) (a) | 76.0 ± 1.2 | 76.33 ± 0.24 | |
ω(°) | −74.2 ± 11.9 | −72.44 ± 5.10 | |
Ω(°) (a) | 27.9 ± 0.6 | 27.71 ± 0.25 |
Notes. The error is given at a 3σ level and contains only the statistical error from the fit and no systematic error from the true north or star registration. (a) We followed the previous conventions used for this system with an ascending node ~ 28° (measured from north, anti-clockwise) for an inclination of ~76° (0° means pole-on) butas noted in Kennedy et al. (2018), the west side is closer to Earth, and therefore the inclination should be strictly ~ 104° (or the node should be ~208° and the inclination retained).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.