Table 2

Comparison of the median z, HR, and dNNb values for the paired subsamples.

Samples N z HR dNNb
(1a) (2a) (3a) (4) (5a) (6) (7a) (8)
(1b) (2b) (3b) (5b) (7b)
0.2 < z < 0.6
AGNhard 237 0.41 0.99 0.56 14.28 0.63
AGNsoft 537 0.42 –0.74 14.22
GAL 42 0.31 0.96 –0.94 10−15 11.15 0.80
AGN* 349 0.31 –0.25 11.97
RAD 72 0.40 0.98 –0.19 0.01 13.84 0.46
nRAD 757 0.40 –0.40 13.61
Faint 43 0.37 0.68 0.23 10−5 12.83 0.86
Lum.AGN 41 0.38 –0.31 13.52
0.6 < z < 1.0
AGNhard 83 0.77 0.99 0.36 24.68 0.66
AGNsoft 430 0.77 –0.72 24.18
RAD 20 0.78 0.99 –0.64 0.24 24.38 0.76
nRAD 341 0.78 –0.72 23.95
Faint 33 0.75 0.65 –0.11 0.03 22.18 0.29
Lum.AGN 33 0.76 –0.40 25.50

Notes. (*)Comparison of GAL and AGN was made only in the 0.2 < z < 0.45 redshift range (limit of the GAL sample). Columns are: (1) subsample name; (2) number of members; (3) median values of the mean z; (5) HR; and (7) dNNb, Mpc of ten randomized samples and the respective Kolmogorov–Smirnov two-sample test probabilities of the distributions (4, 6, 8).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.