Table 1.
Results of fitting two models (power-law and curved) to spectra of galaxies from Fig. 2.
Name | Power-law: A1 | ![]() |
Curved: A2 | ![]() |
p-value (in %) | Best |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGC 660 | −0.47 ± 0.02 | 3.39 | −0.16 ± 0.04 | 1.73 | 0.22 | C |
NGC 891 | −0.69 ± 0.02 | 2.44 | −0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.94 | 0.003 | C |
NGC 972 | −0.56 ± 0.03 | 2.66 | −0.22 ± 0.06 | 1.13 | 0.26 | C |
NGC 1569 | −0.40 ± 0.03 | 4.62 | −0.18 ± 0.04 | 1.93 | 0.06 | C |
NGC 3079 | −0.72 ± 0.02 | 7.88 | −0.12 ± 0.04 | 5.30 | 0.16 | C |
NGC 3627 | −0.57 ± 0.04 | 6.18 | −0.19 ± 0.09 | 4.66 | 2.2 | C |
NGC 3628 | −0.60 ± 0.03 | 6.20 | −0.09 ± 0.04 | 4.93 | 3.5 | C |
NGC 3646 | −0.79 ± 0.02 | 0.23 | −0.03 ± 0.07 | 0.31 | 70 | P |
NGC 3655 | −0.66 ± 0.03 | 0.84 | −0.14 ± 0.09 | 0.66 | 16 | P |
NGC 4102 | −0.63 ± 0.03 | 6.67 | −0.30 ± 0.04 | 1.51 | < 0.001 | C |
NGC 4254 | −0.74 ± 0.03 | 6.24 | −0.11 ± 0.06 | 5.62 | 8.3 | P |
NGC 4826 | −0.43 ± 0.03 | 1.11 | −0.04 ± 0.06 | 1.17 | 51 | P |
NGC 5055 | −0.69 ± 0.04 | 9.04 | −0.17 ± 0.05 | 4.46 | 0.12 | C |
NGC 5371 | −0.63 ± 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.00 ± 0.03 | 0.12 | 90 | P |
NGC 5936 | −0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.02 ± 0.06 | 0.80 | 77 | P |
UGC 3351 | −0.69 ± 0.07 | 7.99 | −0.42 ± 0.11 | 1.97 | 0.70 | C |
UGC 12914 | −0.82 ± 0.03 | 1.59 | −0.19 ± 0.05 | 0.64 | 0.85 | C |
Notes. The best-fitted parameters for the power-law model (A1) and the curved model (A2) as well as the quality of the fits ( ) and the p-value of the F-test are given. The last column shows the selected most reasonable model: P – denotes the power-law model, C – the curved model (see Sect. 3.3).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.