Free Access

Fig. 9


As in Fig. 8 but compared against the BRASS benchmark spectrum of 51 Peg (G2.5IV), observed using the Mercator-HERMES spectrograph (black). Panel a: multiple literature log (gf) values that all provide a good fit to the observed line profile. Panel b: only one literature log (gf) value out of four fits the observed line profile well. Panels c and d: a number of Fe I line log (gf) values with varying qualities of fitting to the observed profiles ranging from excellent fit to poor fit. [1] Kostyk (1982), [2] Fuhr et al. (1988), [3] Lobel (2008), [5] May et al. (1974), [7] Landi et al. (2013), [8] Garz (1973), [9] Nahar (1993), [10] Wiese et al. (1969), [12] Martin et al. (1988), [13] Kostyk (1981), [14] Wallace & Hinkle (2009), [15] Blackwell et al. (1986), [16] Lawler et al. (2013), [4,6,11,17] Kurucz (1999–2014), [18] Raassen & Uylings (1998), [19] same reference as [18] but reported by NIST to a limited precision. The log (gf) uncertainty is ≥50% and calculated by NIST in the same manner as Kramida (2013), and [20] Blackwell et al. (1980).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.