Press Release
Free Access

Fig. 3

image

Upper panel: CO excitation ladder of XID2028 (stars) compared with average values obtained for various classes of sources (ULIRGs, SMGs, BzKs, and the Milky Way, as labelled; taken from Papadopoulos et al. 2012; Bothwell et al. 2013; Daddi et al. 2015; Fixsen et al. 1999), for single objects (Milky Way and Mrk 231; from Fixsen et al. 1999; van der Werf et al. 2010) and from simulations (Bournaud et al. 2015; Narayanan & Krumholz 2014). All SLEDs are normalised to the CO(5 − 4) flux observed in XID2028, for which we report an uncertainty of 0.08 Jy km s−1 also accounting for the 10% flux calibration error. Lower panel: Same as the upper panel, but with the y-axis in logarithmic scale, so that differences in the CO(1 − 0) flux extrapolations can be appreciated.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.