Free Access

Table 4

Comparison of the Mλ of this work with other determinations in the literature.

M λ Reference Calibration Sample Extinction correction

M G Hawkins et al. (2017) 0.44 ± 0.01 972 TGAS (Gaia DR1) E(BV) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015)

This work 0.495 ± 0.009 * 2482 TGAS (Gaia DR1) None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M J Laney et al. (2012) 0.984 ± 0.014 191 Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with SAAO JK mag, None
data corrected for Lutz-Kelker bias

Chen et al. (2017) 1.016 ± 0.063 171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with 2MASS J mag SAGA E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

Hawkins et al. (2017) 0.93 ± 0.01 972 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS J mag EBV from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015)

This work 0.945 ± 0.01* 2098 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS J mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M H Laney et al. (2012) 1.490 ± 0.015 191 Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with SAAO JK mag, None
data corrected for Lutz-Kelker bias

Chen et al. (2017) 1.528 ± 0.055 171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with 2MASS J mag SAGA E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

Hawkins et al. (2017) 1.46 ± 0.01 972 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS J mag EBV from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015)

This work 1.450 ± 0.017 1315 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS J mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M K Alves (2000) 1.61 ± 0.03 238 Hipparcos RC giants with TMSS K mag None

Grocholski & Sarajedini (2002) 1.61 ± 0.04 14 WYIN Open Clusters Twarog et al. (1997)E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

van Helshoecht & Groenewegen (2007) 1.57 ± 0.05 24 2MASS Open Clusters Twarog et al. (1997)E(BV) data

Groenewegen (2008) 1.54 ± 0.04 Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with 2MASS K mag Based on three 3D models

Laney et al. (2012) 1.613 ± 0.015 191 Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with SAAO K mag, None
data corrected for Lutz-Kelker bias

Francis & Anderson (2014) 1.53 ± 0.01 Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with 2MASS K mag Outside 100 pc: Burstein & Heiles (1978, 1982) map
and Bahcall & Soneira (1980) formulae

Chen et al. (2017) 1.626 ± 0.057 171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with 2MASS K band SAGA E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

Hawkins et al. (2017) 1.61 ± 0.01 972 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS K mag E(BV) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015)

This work 1.606 ± 0.009 2482 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS K mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M g Chen et al. (2017) 1.229 ± 0.172 171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with APASS-SLOAN g mag SAGA E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

This work 1.331 ± 0.056* 407 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with APASS-SLOAN g mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M r Chen et al. (2017) 0.420 ± 0.110 171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with APASS-SLOAN r mag SAGA E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

This work 0.552 ± 0.026 * 340 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with APASS-SLOAN r mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M i Chen et al. (2017) 0.157 ± 0.094 171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with APASS-SLOAN i mag SAGA E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

This work 0.262 ± 0.032* 243 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with APASS-SLOAN i mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M W 1 Yaz Gökçe et al. (2013) 1.635 ± 0.026 3889 Revised Hipparcos RC parallaxes with WISE W1 mag E(BV) from 2D map of Schlegel et al. (1998)

Chen et al. (2017) 1.694 ± 0.061 171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with WISE W1 mag SAGA E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

Hawkins et al. (2017) 1.68 ± 0.02 936 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W1 mag E(BV) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015)

This work 1.711 ± 0.017 962 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W1 mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M W 2 Chen et al. (2017) 1.595 ± 0.064 171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with WISE W2 mag SAGA E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

Hawkins et al. (2017) 1.69 ± 0.02 934 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W2 mag E(BV) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015)

This work 1.585 ± 0.016 1031 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W2 mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M W 3 Yaz Gökçe et al. (2013) 1.606 ± 0.024 3889 Revised Hipparcos RC parallaxes with WISE W3 mag E(BV) from 2D map of Schlegel et al. (1998)

Chen et al. (2017) 1.752 ± 0.068 171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with WISE W3 mag SAGA E(BV) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law

Hawkins et al. (2017) 1.67 ± 0.02 936 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W3 mag E(BV) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015)

This work 1.638 ± 0.011 2026 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W3 mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

M W 4 Hawkins et al. (2017) 1.76 ± 0.01 910 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W4 mag E(BV) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015)

This work 1.704 ± 0.012 747 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W4 mag None: low extinction stars selection according
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map

Notes.

(*)

Result from Table 3 assuming GKs colour equal to 2.1.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.