Free Access
Table 4
Comparison of the Mλ of this work with other determinations in the literature.
M λ | Reference | Calibration | Sample | Extinction correction |
|
||||
M G | Hawkins et al. (2017) | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 972 TGAS (Gaia DR1) | E(B−V) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015) |
|
||||
This work | 0.495 ± 0.009 * | 2482 TGAS (Gaia DR1) | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M J | Laney et al. (2012) | −0.984 ± 0.014 | 191 Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with SAAO JK mag, | None |
data corrected for Lutz-Kelker bias | ||||
|
||||
Chen et al. (2017) | −1.016 ± 0.063 | ≲171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with 2MASS J mag | SAGA E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law | |
|
||||
Hawkins et al. (2017) | −0.93 ± 0.01 | 972 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS J mag | EB − V from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015) | |
|
||||
This work | −0.945 ± 0.01* | 2098 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS J mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M H | Laney et al. (2012) | −1.490 ± 0.015 | 191 Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with SAAO JK mag, | None |
data corrected for Lutz-Kelker bias | ||||
|
||||
Chen et al. (2017) | −1.528 ± 0.055 | ≲171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with 2MASS J mag | SAGA E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law | |
|
||||
Hawkins et al. (2017) | −1.46 ± 0.01 | 972 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS J mag | EB − V from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015) | |
|
||||
This work | −1.450 ± 0.017 | 1315 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS J mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M K | Alves (2000) | −1.61 ± 0.03 | 238 Hipparcos RC giants with TMSS K mag | None |
|
||||
Grocholski & Sarajedini (2002) | −1.61 ± 0.04 | 14 WYIN Open Clusters | Twarog et al. (1997)E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law | |
|
||||
van Helshoecht & Groenewegen (2007) | −1.57 ± 0.05 | 24 2MASS Open Clusters | Twarog et al. (1997)E(B−V) data | |
|
||||
Groenewegen (2008) | −1.54 ± 0.04 | Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with 2MASS K mag | Based on three 3D models | |
|
||||
Laney et al. (2012) | −1.613 ± 0.015 | 191 Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with SAAO K mag, | None | |
data corrected for Lutz-Kelker bias | ||||
|
||||
Francis & Anderson (2014) | −1.53 ± 0.01 | Revised Hipparcos parallaxes with 2MASS K mag | Outside 100 pc: Burstein & Heiles (1978, 1982) map | |
and Bahcall & Soneira (1980) formulae | ||||
|
||||
Chen et al. (2017) | −1.626 ± 0.057 | ≲171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with 2MASS K band | SAGA E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law | |
|
||||
Hawkins et al. (2017) | −1.61 ± 0.01 | 972 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS K mag | E(B−V) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015) | |
|
||||
This work | −1.606 ± 0.009 | 2482 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with 2MASS K mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M g | Chen et al. (2017) | 1.229 ± 0.172 | ≲171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with APASS-SLOAN g mag | SAGA E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law |
|
||||
This work | 1.331 ± 0.056* | 407 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with APASS-SLOAN g mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M r | Chen et al. (2017) | 0.420 ± 0.110 | ≲171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with APASS-SLOAN r mag | SAGA E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law |
|
||||
This work | 0.552 ± 0.026 * | 340 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with APASS-SLOAN r mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M i | Chen et al. (2017) | 0.157 ± 0.094 | ≲171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with APASS-SLOAN i mag | SAGA E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law |
|
||||
This work | 0.262 ± 0.032* | 243 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with APASS-SLOAN i mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M W 1 | Yaz Gökçe et al. (2013) | −1.635 ± 0.026 | 3889 Revised Hipparcos RC parallaxes with WISE W1 mag | E(B−V) from 2D map of Schlegel et al. (1998) |
|
||||
Chen et al. (2017) | −1.694 ± 0.061 | ≲171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with WISE W1 mag | SAGA E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law | |
|
||||
Hawkins et al. (2017) | −1.68 ± 0.02 | 936 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W1 mag | E(B−V) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015) | |
|
||||
This work | −1.711 ± 0.017 | 962 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W1 mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M W 2 | Chen et al. (2017) | −1.595 ± 0.064 | ≲171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with WISE W2 mag | SAGA E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law |
|
||||
Hawkins et al. (2017) | −1.69 ± 0.02 | 934 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W2 mag | E(B−V) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015) | |
|
||||
This work | −1.585 ± 0.016 | 1031 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W2 mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M W 3 | Yaz Gökçe et al. (2013) | −1.606 ± 0.024 | 3889 Revised Hipparcos RC parallaxes with WISE W3 mag | E(B−V) from 2D map of Schlegel et al. (1998) |
|
||||
Chen et al. (2017) | −1.752 ± 0.068 | ≲171 RC stars of the SAGA survey with WISE W3 mag | SAGA E(B−V) with Cardelli et al. (1989) law | |
|
||||
Hawkins et al. (2017) | −1.67 ± 0.02 | 936 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W3 mag | E(B−V) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015) | |
|
||||
This work | −1.638 ± 0.011 | 2026 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W3 mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map | ||||
|
||||
M W 4 | Hawkins et al. (2017) | −1.76 ± 0.01 | 910 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W4 mag | E(B−V) from 3D dustmap of Green et al. (2015) |
|
||||
This work | −1.704 ± 0.012 | 747 TGAS (Gaia DR1) with WISE W4 mag | None: low extinction stars selection according | |
to Capitanio et al. (2017) 3D map |
Notes.
(*)
Result from Table 3 assuming G−Ks colour equal to 2.1.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.