Table 2
Properties of ejected fragments formed inside the disk.
Model | Mfrag (MJup) | MHill (MJup) | vs (km s-1) | vi (km s-1) | Ekin/ | Egrav | |
|
|||||
P1 | 24 | 45 | 1.67 | 2.20 | 3.32 (CM) |
P2 | 21 | 40 | 1.18 | 2.80 | 2.93 (S) |
P3 | 23 | 41 | 1.37 | 2.56 | 4.54 (S) |
P4 | 25 | 44 | 1.46 | 1.65 | 1.75 (CM) |
P6 | 10 | 23 | 1.88 | 2.15 | 2.92 (CM) |
R1 | 10 | 25 | 2.13 | 3.33 | 7.32 (CM) |
Notes. Columns show, from left to right, the fragment mass Mfrag, the mass located inside the fragment’s Hill radius MHill, the velocity of the fragment relative to the disk central star vs and the intruder vi, and the ratio of kinetic to potential energy in the reference frame in which this ratio is the lowest with the reference frame indicated in brackets (CM = center of mass system, S = central star).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.