Adaptive optics and lightcurve data of asteroids: twenty shape models and information content analysis

M. Viikinkoski; J. Hanuš; M. Kaasalainen; F. Marchis; J. Ďurech

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731456

Home

All issues

Volume 607 (November 2017)

A&A, 607 (2017) A117

Full HTML

Free Access

Table 1

Rotation state parameters λ_a, β_a, P_a with a reference to the corresponding publication that we used as initial inputs for the modeling with ADAM, rotation state parameters λ, β, P derived by the ADAM algorithm, and the number of available lightcurves N_lc and disk-resolved images N_ao.

Asteroid		λ _a	β _a	P _a	Reference	λ	β	P	N _lc	N _ao
		[deg]	[deg]	[hours]		[deg]	[deg]	[hours]

7	Iris	16	15	7.138843	Kaasalainen et al. (2002)	18 ± 4	19 ± 4	7.138843	39	14
7	Iris	196	2	7.138843	Kaasalainen et al. (2002)	Rejected			39	14
12	Victoria	174	−17	8.66034	Hanuš et al. (2016)	177 ± 4	−34 ± 4	8.66034	53	8
14	Irene	95	−11	15.02986	Hanuš et al. (2011)	91 ± 7	−14 ± 4	15.02988	29	3
15	Eunomia	3	−67	6.082753	Kaasalainen et al. (2002)	0 ± 5	−67 ± 2	6.082752	48	8
23	Thalia	159	−45	12.31241	Torppa et al. (2003)	158 ± 2	−45 ± 4	12.31241	50	2
23	Thalia	343	−69	12.31241	Torppa et al. (2003)	341 ± 3	−73 ± 6	12.31241208	50	2
24	Themis	137	59	8.374187	Hanuš et al. (2016)	138 ± 4	69 ± 5	8.374187	46	4
24	Themis	331	52	8.374187	Hanuš et al. (2016)	328 ± 5	70 ± 2	8.374187	46	4
28	Bellona	102	−8	15.70785	Ďurech et al. (2011)	99 ± 4	−16 ± 6	15.70785	23	1
40	Harmonia	22	31	8.908483	Hanuš et al. (2011)	22 ± 2	38 ± 5	8.908485	23	3
42	Isis	106	40	13.58364	Hanuš et al. (2011)	108 ± 1	47 ± 3	13.58364	31	1
48	Doris	108	47	11.8901	Hanuš et al. (2016)	Rejected			31	2
48	Doris	297	61	11.8901	Hanuš et al. (2016)	296 ± 3	57 ± 5	11.89010	31	2
56	Melete	103	−27	18.14817	Hanuš et al. (2016)	103 ± 1	−26 ± 2	18.14817	34	2
56	Melete	282	−5	18.14817	Hanuš et al. (2016)	283 ± 1	−3 ± 3	18.14817	34	2
65	Cybele	208	−7	6.081434	Franco & Pilcher (2015)	208 ± 1	−3 ± 3	6.081435	59	7
65	Cybele	27	−14	6.081434	Franco & Pilcher (2015)	Rejected			59	7
72	Feronia	102	−55	8.09068	Hanuš et al. (2013a)	100 ± 6	−51 ± 6	8.09068	20	2
121	Hermione	4	13	5.550878	Descamps et al. (2009)	362 ± 2	13 ± 1	5.550877	48	13
146	Lucina	305	−41	18.5539	Ďurech et al. (2009)	304 ± 6	−41 ± 2	18.55387	22	2
250	Bettina	100	17	5.054420	Torppa et al. (2003)	101 ± 2	9 ± 2	5.054414	22	1
283	Emma	251	22	6.895222	Michałowski et al. (2006)	256 ± 3	23 ± 3	6.89523	29	5
283	Emma	85	37	6.895221	Michałowski et al. (2006)	Rejected			29	5
354	Eleonora	144	54	4.277186	Hanuš et al. (2011)	161 ± 8	41 ± 7	4.277186	64	3
511	Davida	297	26	5.129363	Torppa et al. (2003)	299 ± 1	24 ± 1	5.129363	58	10
1036	Ganymed	190	−78	10.31284	Hanuš et al. (2015)	198 ± 10	−79 ± 1	10.31304	177	5

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.