Table 4
Estimated effective temperatures (in K) from this work compared to four different studies.
| Target | Our FeH plots | C08 | M15 | RA12 | L13 | ||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |||
|
|
|||||||
| GJ 179 | 3300 | 3095 | 3383 | 3424 | 3260 | ||
| GJ 203 | 3425 | 3128 | 3297 | 3290 | |||
| GJ 228 | 3525 | 3342 | 3457 | 3550 | |||
| GJ 872B | 3575 | 3045 | 3192 | 3569 | |||
| GJ 3634 | 3550 | 3332 | 3538 | ||||
| GJ 9415 | 3350 | 3163 | 3359 | ||||
Notes. Column 1 contains the temperatures estimated in this work using spectral fitting of FeH lines. Column 2 contains values calculated with the photometric calibration by C08 (Casagrande et al. 2008), and Col. 3 lists values calculated with the photometric calibration by M15. Columns 4 and 5 show the adopted values in the spectroscopic works by RA12 and L13 (Lépine et al. 2013).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.