Free Access
Table 1
Summary of literature regarding Galactic sulphur abundances.
Reference | Mult. | N obs | NLTE | Target | Flat | Slope | Comments | |
line | type | range | range | |||||
|
||||||||
Clegg et al. (1981) | 6 | 20 | – | F&G MS | – | − 0.9 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.4 | large scatter | |
François (1987) | 6 | 13 | – | MP dwarfs | [ Fe / H ] < − 0.5 | − 0.5 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.3 | 1 halo star | |
François (1988) | 6 | 12 | – | field dwarfs | − 1.3 < [ Fe / H ] < − 0.5 | – | 5 are halo stars | |
Takada-Hidai & Takeda (1996) | 6 | 11 | √ | peculiar stars | solar | – | ||
Israelian & Rebolo (2001) | 6 | 8 | – | MP | – | − 3.0 < [ Fe / H ] < − 0.6 | negligible NLTE | |
Takada-Hidai et al. (2002) | 6 | 68 | √ | field stars | – | − 3 < [ Fe / H ] < 0.0 | ||
Chen et al. (2002) | 6, 8, 10 | 26 | – | disc stars | − 1.0 < [ Fe / H ] < − 0.5 | − 0.5 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.5 | – | |
Chen et al. (2003) | 6, 8, 10 | 15 | – | old MR | – | − 0.1 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.5 | – | |
Ecuvillon et al. (2004) | 8 | 112/31 | – | planet/no planet | – | − 0.8 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.5 | – | |
Nissen et al. (2004) | 1, 8 | 34 | – | dwarf/subgiant halo | − 3.2 < [ Fe / H ] < − 0.8 | – | 3D effects small, two deviant stars | |
Ryde & Lambert (2004) | 1 | 10 | – | – | − 3.0 < [ Fe / H ] < − 0.7 | – | – | |
Korn & Ryde (2005) | 1, 6 | 3 | – | MP | − 2.43 < [ Fe / H ] < − 2.08 | – | – | |
Caffau et al. (2005a) | 1, 6, 8 | 74 | – | – | − 3.2 < [ Fe / H ] < − 1.0 (*) | − 1.0 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.5 | in combined lit.sample (253 stars) | |
(*) dual behaviour at [Fe/H] < −1 | ||||||||
Takeda et al. (2005) | 1, 3, 6 | 3 | √ | FGK Stars | − 3.17 < [ Fe / H ] < − 2.0 (*) | − 2.0 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.47 | in combined lit. sample (175 stars) | |
(*) dual behaviour at [Fe/H] < −2 | ||||||||
Ryde (2006) | [ SI ] | 14 | – | disk giants/subgiants | – | − 0.66 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.03 | – | |
Nissen et al. (2007) | 1, 6 | 40 | √ | MS halo | − 3.3 < [ Fe / H ] < − 1.0 | – | low scatter | |
3 | 1 | – | – | [ Fe / H ] = − 1.69 | – | – | ||
Caffau et al. (2007) | 3 | 5 | √ | F-K MS | – | – | test for Mult.3 analysis, good | |
agreement with Mult. 6 and 8 results | ||||||||
Caffau et al. (2010) | 3 | 4 | √ | MP halo | – | – | no flat behaviour, scatter | |
in − 2.42 < [ Fe / H ] < − 1.19 | ||||||||
Takeda & Takada-Hidai (2011) | 3 | 33 | √ | halo/disk | − 2.5 < [ Fe / H ] < − 1.5 | − 1.0 < [ Fe / H ] < 0.0 | jump in A(S) with [Fe/H] | |
− 3.7 < [ Fe / H ] < − 2.5 | ||||||||
Takeda & Takada-Hidai (2012) | 3 | 13 | √ | TO dwarfs & giants | − 3.2 < [ Fe / H ] < − 1.9 | – | – | |
Spite et al. (2011) | 1 | 33 | √ | EMP | − 3.5 < [ Fe / H ] < − 2.9 | – | – | |
Jönsson et al. (2011) | 3, [ SI ] | 10 | √, – | giants | − 3.4 < [ Fe / H ] < − 1.5 | – | A(S) from [SI] larger than from Mult. 3 | |
Matrozis et al. (2013) | [ SI ] | 39 | – | MP giants | − 2.3 < [ Fe / H ] < − 1.0 | − 1.0 < [ Fe / H ] < 0.0 | – | |
Takeda et al. (2016) | 6, 8 | 239 | √ | giants | – | − 0.8 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.2 | high scatter (Mult. 6), A(S) from Mult. 8 | |
6, 8 | 160 | √ | dwarfs | – | − 1.3 < [ Fe / H ] < + 0.5 | A(S) from Mult. 8 | ||
Caffau et al. (2016) | 3 | 4 | √ | dwarfs | – | – | – |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.