Table 2
Results of the variability analysis.
Name | log (Lsoft) | log (Lhard) | log (REdd) | Long-term variability | ΔTmax | Short | UV | ||
|
|||||||||
(0.5–2 keV) | (2–10 keV) | SMF0 | SMF1 | SMF2/3 | (years) | term | Variab. | ||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) |
|
|||||||||
ESO 540-G01 (X, C) | 41.53 ± 0.13 | 41.72 ± 0.13 | – | MEPL | Norm2 | 1 | – | – | |
40% | 38% | 74% | |||||||
ESO 195-IG21 (X, C) | 42.54 ± 0.37 | 43.03 ± 0.37 | – | MEPL | Norm2 | Norm1 | 4 | – | – |
98% | 97% | 91% | 98% | ||||||
ESO 113-G10 (X) | 43.07 ± 0.05 | 42.70 ± 0.05 | –0.74 | ME2PL | Norm1 | 4 | TSH | W2 | |
17% | 17% | 40% | |||||||
NGC 526A (X) | 42.91 ± 0.10 | 43.32 ± 0.09 | –1.16 | 2PL | Norm2 | – | 11 | TSH | W1 |
48% | 46% | 48% | |||||||
MARK 609 (X) | 42.55 ± 0.04 | 42.69 ± 0.04 | – | 2PL | Norm1 | 5 | – | – | |
13% | 13% | 22% | |||||||
NGC 1365 (X)CL | 41.15 ± 0.35 | 42.18 ± 0.42 | –1.95 | ME2PL | N H2 | N2/N1* | 10 | TSH | W1, M2 |
81% | 24% | 68% | 33/35% | ||||||
(X, C) | 41.80 ± 0.38 | 41.73 ± 0.27 | ME2PL | N H2 | Norm2 | 2 | – | – | |
99% | 77% | 37% | 30% | ||||||
NGC 2617 (X) | 43.24 ± 0.15 | 43.25 ± 0.15 | –0.94 | 2PL | Norm1 | N H2 | 0.1 | TS | W1 |
46% | 45% | 59% | 30% | ||||||
MARK 1218 (X) | 41.87 ± 0.22 | 42.56 ± 0.21 | – | PL | Norm | 0.08 | – | No | |
64% | 64% | 63% | |||||||
NGC 2992 (X)CL | 41.57 ± 0.23 | 42.03 ± 0.22 | –2.30 | 2PL | N H2 | Norm2 | 3 | TH | M2 |
19% | 19% | 5% | 21% | ||||||
POX 52 (X, C) | 41.89 ± 0.01 | 41.75 ± 0.02 | 0.18 | ME2PL | N H2 | N H1 | 1 | No | – |
2% | 7% | 44% | 100% | ||||||
NGC 4138 (X, C) | – | 41.53 ± 0.07 | –2.42 | PL** | Norm | 2 | – | – | |
21% | 98% | ||||||||
NGC 4395 (C) | 39.50 | 39.94 | –1.15 | ME2PL | N H2 | 0.003 | – | W1 | |
0% | 0% | 31% | |||||||
(X) | 39.69 ± 0.06 | 40.28 ± 0.40 | ME2PL | N H2 | Norm2 | 12 | TSH | – | |
15% | 13% | 20% | 88% | ||||||
(X, C) | 39.78 ± 0.21 | 40.21 ± 0.22 | ME2PL | Norm2 | 2 | – | – | ||
61% | 65% | 93% | |||||||
NGC 4565 (X, C) | 39.51 ± 0.03 | 39.65 ± 0.07 | –4.63 | PL | N H | 2 | No | – | |
11% | 21% | 48% | |||||||
MARK 883 (X) | 42.42 ± 0.09 | 42.71 ± 0.08 | –1.15 | PL | Norm | 4 | – | W1, W2 | |
28% | 28% | 28% | |||||||
IRAS 20051-1117 (X) | 42.39 ± 0.09 | 42.53 ± 0.09 | –1.16 | PL | Norm | 0.5 | – | No | |
29% | 29% | 29% |
Notes. (Column 1) name, and the instrument (C: Chandra and/or X: XMM–Newton) in parenthesis (CL refer to changing-look candidates); (Cols. 2 and 3) logarithm of the soft (0.5–2 keV) and hard (2–10 keV) X-ray luminosities, where the mean was calculated for variable objects, and percentages in flux variations; (Col. 4) Eddington ratio, Lbol/LEdd, calculated from Eracleous et al. (2010) using Lbol = 33L2−10 keV; (Col. 5) best fit for SMF0; (Col. 6) parameter varying in SMF1, with the percentage of variation; (Col. 7) parameter varying in SMF2 and SMF3 (for NGC 1365,
N1 = Norm1, and N2 = Norm2), with the percentage of variation; (Col. 8) the sampling timescale, corresponding to the difference between the first and the last observation. The percentages correspond to this ΔTmax; (Col. 9) short-term variations in the total (T), soft (S), and/or hard (H) energy bands; and (Col. 10) filters where variations are detected at UV frequencies with the OM. A “–” means that data were not available, while “No” means that variations were not detected.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.