Fig. A.1

Comparison between the metallicity derived with the code HCm and different strong-line calibrations. Top: a combination of calibrations by Maiolino et al. (2008) and corrected McGaugh (1991) calibration. Bottom: calibrations by Pettini & Pagel (2004) and Marino et al. (2013). A histogram is shown in each panel displaying the difference between the metallicities estimated with each of the four strong-line methods and HCm. In the bottom part, the difference is plotted as a function of HCm values.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.