Table 3
Reduced 
from GEM-FIND fitting.
| Target | Baseline | Year | NOB | UD | Gauss | Ell. UD | Ell. Gauss. | UD+Gauss |
| [m] | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| θAps | 10–17 | 2011/12 | 6 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.41 | 0.38 | ... |
| R Crt | 10–16 | 2012 | 5 | 10.17 | 2.53 | 1.18 | 1.04 | ... |
| 10–64 | 2009/11/12 | 8 | 46.27 | 28.31 | 18.18 | 17.74 | 0.69 | |
| R Leo | 11–16 | 2012 | 4 | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.09 | 0.11 | ... |
| 11–64 | 2006/07 | 18 | 38.55 | 14.73 | 8.03 | 10.84 | 7.17 | |
| T Mic | 11–16 | 2011 | 4 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.09 | 0.11 | ... |
| 11–46 | 2004/11 | 7 | 1.16 | 0.96 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.24 | |
| RT Vir | 13–15 | 2012 | 2 | 1.31 | 1.13 | ... | ... | ... |
| 12–128 | 2008/09/11/12 | 14 | 49.10 | 25.13 | 22.80 | 20.51 | 3.04 | |
| π1 Gru | 10–15 | 2011 | 3 | 4.83 | 3.44 | 0.57 | 0.42 | ... |
| 10–62 | 2006/11 | 11 | 23.23 | 23.56 | 21.59 | 21.49 | 0.73 | |
| o1 Ori | 32–46 | 2011 | 7 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.79 | 0.78 | ... |
| 32–129 | 2005/11 | 14 | 2.04 | 2.01 | 1.90 | 1.85 | 1.43 | |
| U Ant | 30 | 2012 | 1 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 30–95 | 2008–2012 | 3 | 1.20 | 1.23 | 0.65 | 0.63 | ... | |
| R Lep | 34–40 | 2012 | 6 | 1.59 | 0.93 | 1.32 | 0.90 | ... |
| 34–79 | 2011/12 | 10 | 2.38 | 3.65 | 1.39 | 3.55 | 0.96 | |
| Y Pav | 50–63 | 2011 | 4 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.44 | 0.44 | |
| TX Psc | 60–140 | 2011 | 6 | 0.99 | 1.19 | 0.90 | 1.09 | ... |
| 11–140 | 2004–2011 | 15 | 1.28 | 1.32 | 1.29 | 1.32 | 1.34 | |
| S Sct | 40–45 | 2011 | 2 | 2.63 | 2.61 | ... | ... | ... |
| X TrA | 21–34 | 2011 | 5 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.30 | ... |
| AQ Sgr | 37–42 | 2011 | 2 | 2.39 | 2.47 | ... | ... | ... |
Notes. The range in baseline length is given as “Baseline”. The number of observations used for the fitting is given as NOB. The first row corresponds to the data of the LP. The second row corresponds to fits were the LP and archive data were merged. If only data points with similar position angles were available, the elliptical models were not fitted. The 
of the model best fitting the data is highlighted in boldface. The resulting best-fitting parameters are given in Table 4, whereas the dates of the observations are given in Appendix B.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.