Free Access
Table 1
Target allocation ratio of the TMBM compared to the VFTS.
| Category | TMBM | VFTS | Completion |
|
|
|||
| Entire region | |||
|
|
|||
| SBc | 80 | 116 | 69% |
| RV var. | 13 | 36 | 36% |
|
|
|||
| NGC 2070 | |||
|
|
|||
| SBc | 28 | 51 | 55% |
| RV var. | 3 | 15 | 20% |
|
|
|||
| NGC 2060 | |||
|
|
|||
| SBc | 18 | 28 | 64% |
| RV var. | 5 | 13 | 38% |
|
|
|||
| Outside clusters | |||
|
|
|||
| SBc | 34 | 37 | 92% |
| RV var. | 5 | 8 | 63% |
Notes. Only O-type binaries are considered. As in Sana et al. (2013a), membership to a cluster is defined as having an angular separation of less than 2.4′ with respect to the center of the considered association.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.