Free Access

Table 3

Comparison with previous CO excitation analyses.

Parameter Locationa This work Nikolić+07d Pineda+08e Mizuno+10f
Allb Subc

Tk (K) [0, 2] 324 72 15–95
[0, 1] 471 126 ~80 ~70

n(H2) (103 cm-3) [0, 2] 2.9 16.0 10
[0, 1] 2.2 7.9 ~10 ~4

N(CO) (1017 cm-2) [0, 2] 3.4 8.5 6–12
[0, 1] 2.7 8.5 ~10g ~35

Ω (10-1) [0, 2] 1.6 1.0 0.9–7.0
[0, 1] 2.1 1.0 ~2

Notes.

(a)

Pixel location (Fig. 8). [0, 2] and [0, 1] correspond to (05h39m36.8s, − 69°4512.6′′) and (05h39m36.8s, − 69°4542.6′′).

(b)

“All”: RADEX solutions determined using all available CO transitions (Sect. 4.2).

(c)

“Sub”: RADEX solutions for CO transitions only up to J = 7–6 (Sect. 4.5).

(d)

CO(1–0), CO(2–1), CO(3–2), 13CO(1–0), and 13CO(2–1) lines were modeled with the non-LTE radiative transfer model by Jansen et al. (1994).

(e)

CO (Ju = 1, 4, and 7), 13CO (Ju = 1 and 4), and [CI] (609 μm and 370 μm) transitions were analyzed using the escape probability radiative transfer model by Stutzki & Winnewisser (1985).

(f)

CO (Ju = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7) and 13CO (Ju = 1, 2, 3, and 4) data were combined with the large velocity gradient (LVG) model by Goldreich & Kwan (1974).

(d,e,f)

All analyses were done on 45′′ scales.

(g)

CO linewidth of 10 km s-1 is used for this estimate.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.