Table 3
Comparison with previous CO excitation analyses.
Parameter | Locationa | This work | Nikolić+07d | Pineda+08e | Mizuno+10f | |
Allb | Subc | |||||
|
||||||
Tk (K) | [0, 2] | 324![]() |
72![]() |
15–95 | ||
[0, 1] | 471![]() |
126![]() |
~80 | ~70 | ||
|
||||||
n(H2) (103 cm-3) | [0, 2] | 2.9![]() |
16.0![]() |
10 | ||
[0, 1] | 2.2![]() |
7.9![]() |
~10 | ~4 | ||
|
||||||
N(CO) (1017 cm-2) | [0, 2] | 3.4![]() |
8.5![]() |
6–12 | ||
[0, 1] | 2.7![]() |
8.5![]() |
~10g | ~35 | ||
|
||||||
Ω (10-1) | [0, 2] | 1.6![]() |
1.0![]() |
0.9–7.0 | ||
[0, 1] | 2.1![]() |
1.0![]() |
~2 |
Notes.
Pixel location (Fig. 8). [0, 2] and [0, 1] correspond to (05h39m36.8s, − 69°45′12.6′′) and (05h39m36.8s, − 69°45′42.6′′).
“All”: RADEX solutions determined using all available CO transitions (Sect. 4.2).
“Sub”: RADEX solutions for CO transitions only up to J = 7–6 (Sect. 4.5).
CO(1–0), CO(2–1), CO(3–2), 13CO(1–0), and 13CO(2–1) lines were modeled with the non-LTE radiative transfer model by Jansen et al. (1994).
CO (Ju = 1, 4, and 7), 13CO (Ju = 1 and 4), and [CI] (609 μm and 370 μm) transitions were analyzed using the escape probability radiative transfer model by Stutzki & Winnewisser (1985).
CO (Ju = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7) and 13CO (Ju = 1, 2, 3, and 4) data were combined with the large velocity gradient (LVG) model by Goldreich & Kwan (1974).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.