Table 2
Different models for the convergence and consistency study.
| Ndisc | SPH code | |||
|
|
||||
| (103) | Gadget2 | Nsim | Fi | Nsim |
|
|
||||
| 4 | G4 | 4 | F4 | 1 |
| 8 | G8 | 2 | F8 | 1 |
| 16 | G16 | 1 | F16 | 1 |
| G16NF (no ISM inflow) | 1 | – | ||
| G16CV (constant αSPH) | 1 | – | ||
| 32 | G32 | 1 | – | |
| 64 | G64 | 1 | – | |
| 128 | G128 | 1 | – | |
Notes. Columns 1 to 5: the number of disc particles in a simulation, the label of that simulation and the number of runs of that simulation for Gadget2 and Fi, respectively. Non-standard assumptions are mentioned between brackets. For every run, we use the basic set-up as discussed in Sect. 3. Note that the total number of particles in each simulation is a factor of 7 higher.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.