Table 18
Difference of χ2 values between pairs of best-fit models in different ℓ −ranges for the co-added TT power spectrum.
| Multipole range | Δℓmax = 999 | Δℓmax = 1404 | ΔAL |
|
|
|||
| 30–129 ............... | 0.1 | 0.31 | 0.4 |
| 130–229 ............... | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.3 |
| 230–329 ............... | -0.4 | -0.22 | -0.45 |
| 330–429 ............... | 0.34 | -0.09 | 0.22 |
| 430–529 ............... | -0.01 | 0.17 | 0.26 |
| 530–629 ............... | 0.61 | -0.26 | -0.2 |
| 630–729 ............... | -1.66 | -0.8 | -0.8 |
| 730–829 ............... | -1.15 | -0.13 | -0.79 |
| 830–929 ............... | -0.45 | 0.01 | 0.91 |
| 930–1029 ............... | -0.87 | 0.41 | 0.58 |
| 1030–1129 ............... | 2.17 | -0.94 | -0.24 |
| 1130–1229 ............... | 1.65 | 1.47 | -0.17 |
| 1230–1329 ............... | 0.87 | 0.17 | -0.08 |
| 1330–1429 ............... | 6.21 | -1.46 | -0.64 |
| 1430–1529 ............... | -0.2 | 3.35 | -0.62 |
| 1530–1629 ............... | 0.78 | 0.27 | -0.44 |
| 1630–1729 ............... | 0.73 | 0.9 | 0.06 |
| 1730–1829 ............... | 0@ | 1.18 | -0.01 |
| 1830–1929 ............... | 0.59 | -0.08 | -0.31 |
| 1930–2029 ............... | 0.21 | 0.04 | -0.04 |
| 2030–2129 ............... | 0@ | 0.57 | -0.12 |
| 2130–2229 ............... | 0.11 | 0.19 | -0.18 |
| 2230–2329 ............... | -0.17 | 0.25 | -0.2 |
| 2330–2429 ............... | 0.06 | -0.16 | 0.09 |
| 2430–2508 ............... | 2.63 | 2.66 | -0.19 |
Notes. The first column shows the ℓ-range, the second shows the difference Δℓmax = 999 between the χ2 values for a ΛCDM best-fit model obtained using either a likelihood with ℓmax = 999 or the baseline, i.e., 
. The ℓmax = 999 case was run fixing the foreground parameters to the best fit of the baseline case. The third column is the same as the second, but for ℓmax = 1404. The fourth column shows the difference ΔAL between the χ2 values obtained in the ΛCDM+AL and the ΛCDM frameworks. In this case, all the foreground and nuisance parameters were free to vary in the same way as in the baseline case.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.