Table 16
Constraints on mixed adiabatic and isocurvature models.
Model (and data) | 100βiso(klow) | 100βiso(kmid) | 100βiso(khigh) | 100cosΔ | 100αℛℛ(2,2500) | Δn | Δχ2 | lnB |
|
||||||||
General models: | ||||||||
CDI (TT+lowP) | 4.1 | 35.4 | 56.9 | [−30:20] | [98.1:101.5] | 3 | −2.1 | −8.8 |
CDI (TT+lowP+WP) | 4.2 | 35.5 | 57.2 | [−31:23] | [97.9:101.4] | 3 | −1.8 | −9.1 |
CDI (TT, TE, EE+lowP) | 2.0 | [3.4:28.1] | [3.1:51.8] | [−6:20] | [98.5:99.9] | 3 | −5.3 | −8.8 |
CDI (TT, TE, EE+lowP+WP) | 2.1 | [2.3:28.4] | [2.6:52.1] | [−7:21] | [98.5:99.9] | 3 | −5.5 | −8.2 |
CDI (TT+lowP+lensing) | 4.5 | 37.9 | 59.4 | [−28:17] | [98.1:101.1] | 3 | −1.2 | −8.8 |
|
||||||||
NDI (TT+lowP) | 14.3 | 22.4 | 27.4 | [−33:1] | [98.6:104.0] | 3 | −2.0 | −5.3 |
NDI (TT, TE, EE+lowP) | 7.3 | [3.4:19.3] | [3.5:26.7] | [−9:10] | [97.8:100.1] | 3 | −5.5 | −5.5 |
NDI (TT+lowP+lensing) | 15.8 | [1.4:24.1] | [0.3:28.4] | [−32:0] | [98.6:104.0] | 3 | −2.8 | −4.6 |
|
||||||||
NVI (TT+lowP) | 8.3 | [0.1:10.2] | 11.9 | [−26:6] | [97.6:102.3] | 3 | −2.8 | −6.3 |
NVI (TT, TE, EE+lowP) | 7.4 | [0.9:7.4] | [0.4:8.8] | [−22:−4] | [99.2:102.0] | 3 | −6.2 | −6.5 |
NVI (TT+lowP+lensing) | 9.7 | [0.4:11.6] | 13.1 | [−23:7] | [97.1:102.0] | 3 | −2.5 | −6.5 |
|
||||||||
General models + r: | ||||||||
CDI+r=0.1 (TT+lowP) | 3.4 | 38.7 | 63.9 | [−33:24] | [98.1:101.4] | 3 | −5.4 | −8.9 |
CDI+r=0.1 (TT, TE, EE+lowP) | 1.6 | [4.4:31.7] | [6.9:59.2] | [−6:22] | [98.6:99.9] | 3 | −6.3 | −8.1 |
CDI+r (TT+lowP) | 4.3 | 34.9 | 56.2 | [−43:20] | [97.9:102.4] | 3 | −3.3 | −7.7 |
CDI+r (TT, TE, EE+lowP) | 1.7 | [3.9:29.0] | [5.8:53.8] | [−5:21] | [98.6:99.9] | 3 | −5.1 | −7.2 |
|
||||||||
Special CDI cases: | ||||||||
Uncorrelated, nℐℐ = 1 | ||||||||
“axion” (TT+lowP) | 3.3 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0 | [98.5:100] | 1 | 0.0 | −5.2 |
“axion” (TT, TE, EE+lowP) | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 0 | [98.4:100] | 1 | −0.2 | −4.9 |
“axion” (TT+lowP+lensing) | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 0 | [98.3:100] | 1 | 0.0 | −5.0 |
Fully correlated, nℐℐ = nℛℛ | ||||||||
“curvaton I” (TT+lowP) | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 100 | [97.5:100.0] | 1 | −0.1 | −8.1 |
“curvaton I” (TT, TE, EE+lowP) | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 100 | [97.8:99.9] | 1 | 0.0 | −7.8 |
“curvaton I” (TT+lowP+lensing) | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 100 | [97.3:99.7] | 1 | 0.0 | −8.5 |
Fully anti-correlated, nℐℐ = nℛℛ | ||||||||
“curvaton II” (TT+lowP) | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | −100 | [100.5:105.1] | 1 | −1.1 | −5.4 |
“curvaton II” (TT, TE, EE+lowP) | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | −100 | [100.1:101.8] | 1 | 0.0 | −8.9 |
“curvaton II” (TT+lowP+lensing) | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.52 | −100 | [100.4:104.4] | 1 | −0.6 | −6.3 |
Notes. For each mixed model, we report 95% CL bounds on the fractional primordial contribution of isocurvature modes at three comoving wavenumbers (klow = 0.002 Mpc-1, kmid = 0.050 Mpc-1, and khigh = 0.100 Mpc-1), as well as the scale-independent primordial correlation fraction, cosΔ. The fractional adiabatic contribution to the observed temperature variance is denoted by αℛℛ(2,2500), and from this the nonadiabatic contribution can be calculated as αnon - adi = 1−αℛℛ(2,2500). The number of extra parameters compared with the corresponding pure adiabatic model is denoted by Δn, and Δχ2 is the difference between the χ2 of the best-fitting mixed and pure adiabatic models. (A negative Δχ2 means that the mixed model is a better fit to the data.) In the last column we give the difference between the logarithm of Bayesian evidences. (A negative lnB = ln(PISO/PADI) means that Bayesian model comparison disfavours the mixed model. With our settings of MultiNest the uncertainty in these numbers is about ±0.5.)
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.